Essay on Human Evolution and Development of the Phone

Human growth and development is the lengthy process of evolution by which individuals began from apelike predecessors (Gee, 2015). Logical confirmation validates that the behavioral and physical qualities shared by all people started from apelike progenitors and advanced over a period of around six million years. Human evolution has been misunderstood for a long time, and Henry Gee tries to explain how this development works. In this paper, a different perspective of human evolution will be described based on Henry Gee's thoughts. Likewise, a conclusion will be drawn at the end of the paper on how the human evolution should be understood rather than the errors that most individuals make in trying to explain this evolution.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Ways that Humanity Misinterprets the Fossil Record

One of the ways in which humanity misunderstands the fossil record is by believing entirely that the primate fossils are human. Some of the recent studies show that these primate fossils are not human at all (Gee, 2015). Although people evolved from apes, the use of pieces of bones that age more than seven million years to prove human evolution from these apes does not make much sense. One of the biggest problems in finding the right fossils that can be related to human evolution is dating them. Different species of apes existed during the period of human evolution, and as a result, use of the wrong dating method can result in the identification of the primate species that humans did not evolve from (Murphy, 1992). However, most of the individuals who study human evolution believe easily in the fossils presented to them and as a result, end up making the wrong conclusions.

Another error that Henry Gee emphasizes on is human exceptionalism (Gee, 2015). Visiting the many components of individuals that have intermittently been utilized to recognize us from whatever is left of the creature world, Henry Gee explains that our transformative result is one probability among numerous, one that owes more to chance than to a sorted out movement to superior quality. Most of us tend to believe so much on what science explains about human existence that we end up being misled. Though science is sometimes very accurate, the explanation of human evolution from apes cannot be entirely based on scientific findings according to Henry Gee (Gee, 2015).

Gee also tries to explain the mistake that people make in trying to compare human attributes to those of animals (Gee, 2015). He states that some human traits such as intelligence, language and large brain size can never be comparable to those of animals. Animals specifically, apes where humans are claimed to have evolved from have inferior attributes to those of human beings. Therefore, using these attributes as a fact to prove human evolution from apes is not a good enough reason to convince someone of this evolution. Some of the animal attributes are not comparable to those of human beings such as language and Gee uses this as another fact to support his claim that people make a mistake in trying to understand human evolution.

The possibility of a missing connection amongst humanity and our creature predecessors originates before advancement and prominent science and has religious roots in the deist idea of the Great Chain of Being (Murphy, 1992). The illustration has held up itself in the contemporary creative energy, and new fossil revelations are regularly hailed in features as uncovering the subtle transitional stride, the minute when people quit being animals and began being human. This is the misleading fact that Gee tries to explain in his book in details. He argues that it mirrors a significant misconception of how development functions and, when connected to the advancement of our species, underpins mixed up thoughts regarding our particular place in the universe (Murphy, 1992).

Evolution of the Telephone

The development of the phone can be used to explain human evolution since they are connected in some ways. One of the sections of technology that has seen much change is the telephone section. Though cell phones have assumed control over our present society, they have been around for a very long while in different forms (Hornblow, 1986). Telephone evolution has seen changes in its size, speed, appearance among other characteristics. On their discovery, phones were only used for basic purposes, mostly communication. It used to cost massive amounts of capital to get access to these phones. As time advanced, multipurpose mobile phones have been discovered with the ability to serve different purposes apart from communicating. Modern telephones have improved speed, are smaller in size and can serve different purposes. This evolution of the telephone can be likened to human development in more ways than one (Hornblow, 1986).

The fossil record does not bolster the development of chimp-like species into human species. Instead, hominin fossils, for the most part, fall into two special gatherings: primate-like species and human-like species, with a huge, unbridged crevice between them (Gifford, 2008). Just like telephone evolution, the two species have seen advancement in different areas as time has progressed. With regards to human progress, significant cases of transitional fossils are prominently deficient. Notwithstanding, transitional fossils may exist, and in different settings, there are some conceivable cases of transitional fossils. These transitional fossils can be compared to the different kind of telephones that have been used over the years in an attempt to come up with the perfect blend of the most efficient handset (Gifford, 2008). The existence of these fossils has been used by most scientists to explain human evolution.

One of the major signposts of change in the telephone growth has been its nature, which encompasses things like its appearance, the speed of communication and the purpose which its meant for (Hornblow, 1986). The changes in telephone appearance can be comparable to human evolution in the emergence, from the ape to the current human form. It has been one of the most noticeable changes among the human evolution that most scientists like to talk about. Human advancement is not only one taxon developing from another, but rather includes expanding and speciation. This is not, of course, astounding, as it is the manner by which transformative change works in different heredities, yet it fortifies the likeness between examples of human development and those seen in various gatherings of creatures (Gifford, 2008).

What Fossils Represent

The fossils used to explain human evolution mostly do not constitute an interconnected chain of cause and effect. The fundamental reason is that of the way that the fossil record does not speak to a straight line of family line by any stretch of the imagination. A big portion of these primary primates left no posterities and virtually became extinct completely. Still, others are in all likelihood direct progenitors of current day Homo sapiens or people (Gee, 2015). Still, researchers currently are unaware of the aggregate number of primate species that existed, because new fossils are being discovered to date, which makes the account of human development to be clearer more and more with every passing decade.

It's, therefore, clear that these fossils do not represent the unfolding of a predetermined lineage. The indication is therefore that evolution among population works by chance. It can further be explained by the fact that in every community, a few people, mainly due to chance, desert a couple of a greater number of relatives than other individuals (Feldman, 2003). The qualities of the cutting edge will be the qualities of the fortunate people, not necessarily the more profitable or better ones. This happens to all populations, and there is no keeping away from the impulses of possibility.

Conclusion

As indicated by Gee, the common picture of human evolution as lines of lineage and plunge is an entirely human innovation made afterward, molded to accord with human preferences (Gee, 2015). Rather than trying to convince their thoughts, most scientists should come up with the right conclusions on human evolution rather than misleading people on the same matter. Henry Gee urges people to sort the valid explanations on human evolution so as to get a better understanding of their evolution.

References

Gee, H. (2015). The accidental species: misunderstandings of human evolution. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.

Hornblow, A. R. (1986). The evolution and effectiveness of telephone counselling services. Psychiatric Services, 37(7), 731-733.

Gifford, A. (2008). Peter J. Richerson and Robert Boyd, Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution.

Murphy, M. (1992). The future of the body: Explorations into the Further Evolution of human nature. Omni, 14(8), 6-7.

Feldman, M. W. (2003). The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nature Genetics, 33, 266-275.