Essay on Motor Vehicle Theft

Throughout the recent decade, approach and resources have been centered around on lessening violent violations, sex offenses, and drugs. The first Sentencing Reform Act enacted by the I98I Legislature, set auto theft at the minimum of the seriousness list, with a rank of "I" and a standard scope of 0 to 60 days. What has changed in the course of the recent 20 years is both the value of cars and the prevalence of this crime. Auto theft is a crime that has a financial effect on everybody who drives and insures an auto in this country. On acknowledgment of this, the paper will elaborate deeply on the motor vehicle theft, how it has evolved over the years, and the ways that authorities are battling this menace (Mijalkovic 2013:17).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Auto thieves can change an auto in one of three diverse ways: it will be disassembled for parts, exported, or cloned/made over. The vehicles are destroyed to supply the legitimate reused parts market. The stolen vehicle is taken to an unlawful workshop where it is totally stripped. The interest for stolen exported autos from North America is increasing throughout the world. Montreal and Toronto are both close to the American boarder, which make a brilliant place for theft rings to export vehicles. Quebec and Ontario are great for sending out stolen vehicles. An auto theft ring gets destroyed vehicles on the legal market, and after that takes a vehicle with similar attributes. The criminals then exchange the vehicle original plate number of the destroyed vehicle to the stolen vehicle, consequently giving it the identity of the destroyed vehicle.

While auto theft is profitable, professional auto thieves is an increasing reason for a bigger number of auto thefts. However, most of the auto thieves are non-experts. Ordinarily, young people who are intrigued by the modest excite of quick money. Typically, most thieves steal autos for a quick gain as well as to drive, maybe to help commit another crime, for example, robbery. The larger part of car thieves are young people, unlicensed, and looking for a brisk excite ride and whatever individual property they can take, including auto seats, stereos, and mobile phones. The profile of an auto thief is somebody who has likely committed many robberies and has been convicted some times. Besides, the greater part of robberies is likely made by a small number of thieves who proceed with the cycle. They confront weak punishments, even after about six convictions, and stealing many dollars of hardware and bringing on huge property harm. The good news is that a large part of the stolen autos are recovered; the terrible news is that they are destroyed by the criminals, who dismantle dashboards for stereos, neglectfully or malignantly crush the body of the auto, or even smolder it to evacuate fingerprints (Roberts, 2012: 56)

There are many explanations behind the increasing in auto theft, one of them being the low odds of being arrested. As indicated by the FBI, broadly I4% of all auto robberies end in arrest. All the more imperatively are the outcomes of being arrested. In juvenile court, it takes five convictions before an auto thief can get over 30 days confinement. Upon the fifth conviction for auto theft, the guilty party gets a sentence of I5 to 36 weeks. An adult stealing for the first time sentenced for a term of 0 to 60 days in prison. Under the current sentencing rules, it takes seven convictions for auto theft before a wrongdoer faces one year in jail. And still, at the end of the day, the I2-month sentence turns into a real sentence of eight months.

A straightforward way to rectify the increasing pattern of auto theft is to raise the consequences of the crime. In adult sentencing, Grand theft auto is positioned with a seriousness level of I, the least on the books. It shares this position to forgery and "second-degree" property crime where the property has a value of over $250 and under $I,500. The normal value of a stolen auto is more than $5,000 as indicated by FBI measurements. The present seriousness level makes this crime a bargain to the criminal. Like the adult sentencing framework, the juvenile sentencing framework utilizes a numbering framework, which records the violations seriousness. Instead of utilizing Roman numerals, it attributes a letter to every crime; running from A+ to E. Terrific theft auto is at present a "C" under this framework, with the outcome that it takes five convictions to be sentenced to a state JRA office. By making the position B, it would take three convictions for taking an engine vehicle to gain a guarantee to JRA for an I5 to 36-week sentence. On the off chance that earlier convictions were considered 2 points and the seriousness level was increased to II, then it would take just three convictions for auto theft to acquire a jail sentence, rather than seven convictions, as under present law. However, this proposition has little effect on the outcomes to the main wrongdoer.

A conceivable argument against my answer would be that this framework would bring about a congestion of the detainment facilities, in which there as of now exists. Despite the fact that this argument in a way may end up being valid, my answer essentially concentrating on repeating thieves. The real auto thieves who are caught stealing over and again will be the ones to be sentenced to jail, keeping the number of auto criminals detained low. This arrangement will leave the young people and one-time guilty parties with more points against them, giving them a greater amount of motivation not to carry out a similar crime.

The price of autos has increased; similarly the price of stealing them. Lifting the crime from a C to a B lawful offense, and from a seriousness level I to an II, in addition to twofold including priors for adult thieves would put the best possible value on today's auto theft crime. Rather than seven convictions before jail, it would be three for adult thieves. Rather than five convictions before a JRA responsibility, it would be three for young people. This is the best and most pertinent arrangement (Parker, 2012;67).

Conclusively, we have seen how the auto theft has been on the rise. However, the steps taken by the authorities have put good measures that helped tackle this menace. Criminals have come up with new ways to commit this crime. Since this, new measures should continually be formulated to be able to catch up with this menace.

Reference

Mijalkovic, Sasa. "The quantitative analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution in cases of motor vehicle theft in Belgrade." Bezbednost, Beograd 55.I (20I3): I7-34.

Parker, Khristy. "Juvenile Violent and Property Crime Arrests in Alaska, 20022010." (2012).

Roberts, Aki, and Steven Block. "Explaining temporary and permanent motor vehicle theft rates in the United States: A crime-specific approach." Journal of research in crime and delinquency (20I2): 00224278I2453I43.