Essay Sample on Benefits and Drawbacks of IPO Going Public

Introduction

IPOs are a prodigious approach for organizations to acquire high volumes of investment to obtain liquidity speedily. The capital can then be allocated for use to improving the firm's infrastructure or expand the business. One of the chief advantages to industries is that by marketing their shares, they are not required to reimburse financiers the cash they gain.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

IPO enables investors to monetize their investment. Majority of the initial stakeholders of a novel firm are at times interested in auctioning their investment and more interestingly, IPO effortlessly permits them to do just that. This is because the IPO opens a way for the stockholders to sell their shares to the general public. In this way, they give away their authority and ownership of the company which now becomes a public investment.

Another benefit to going public is that it expands the company's exposure. Becoming public means that the company gets respect and a good general appearance. By being ranked on the main stock list, the public is made to consider the company and attract media attention highly. The media now spread the information about the company to many places thus the company is widely known. The company gains fame which makes the goods and services it produces more valued by the public and this increase sale simultaneously.

Moreover, the company going public means that it can acquire the benefit of stock. Ability to provide stock makes the company have many selections and elasticity. The possession of worker stock plans helps the firm select high experts to the organization. Moreover, the advanced inspection that is done by SEC filings means that the business can get improved rates when it gives debit. Giving out debts enables the investment to make more funding chances in the prospect.

Despite the enjoyed merits of IPO, it also has some limitations to the companies that adopt it. Firstly, the massive legitimate, secretarial, and selling budgets related to the IPO process may at times be impossible to be afforded by a small firm. This can be attributed to the fact that a small firm is still growing and lacks the capital necessary to carry out all these costly processes associated with IPO. Secondly, the enterprise's tasks can be troubled since the required time, devotion, and power of senior management take a severe toll. Dispensing of stock may also dictate the loss of regulation for the administration given that the stockholders may be offered some authority in the future directions of the investment.

SEC filings require that particular data from the company be disclosed to it, and this may be a limitation to some industries. A publicly-traded organization should consist of a board that directs its activities which must provide a report of its economic data quarterly. It is feared that this data can be relevant to the organization's rivals. By accessing the information, the company's competitors may use it efficiently to draw means to compete and beat the other company in the market.

Conclusion

IPOs can be very dangerous to investors. It is quite difficult to forecast the behavior of the stock at the start of the trading considering that there is barely any information on the track records of the firm to scrutinize. IPOs are given out by enterprises undergoing fast growth, and therefore high doubt exists in forecasting the well-being of the firm in the future. This calls for some precautions to be taken before falling for IPOs.