Essay Sample on US Invasion of Iraq in 2003

Introduction

Conflict in Iraq began in 2003 which led to a war where the US invaded Iraq in order to withdraw the government that threatened its operations. The US believed that the leader and president of Iraq government Saddam Hussein possessed secretive tactics including military forces which if the situation could have been left uncontrolled, lives of people across the globe would be in danger as purported by the planned civil war (Pillar 112). The US government as directed by Bush's administration believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and it also posed threats to the US and its allies about the civil war.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Bush invaded US to legitimize the allegations that Iraq had plans to attack the US and the coalition of its allies (Pillar 114). It was, therefore, a defense mechanism in order to respond to the threats of Saddam Hussein's administration and the purported international terrorism that could affect many nations. According to Hussein, the destruction particularly bombing was to awake the bombing that had been experienced in 2001 at the international community trade center. The US, therefore, laid down its strategies and captured Hussein Saddam so that the social, economic and political life of people could be protected and therefore ensuring that there are peace and stability of all countries globally.

America is a powerful state and therefore it is important to protect other states in case of threats especially national and international security. The underlying perspective falls under the realism concept which depicts that, strong and powerful nations with enough resources should act the dominant roles. To justify this, US was a strong, prestigious and powerful nation which will assist in decision making especially on matters that involve the general public (Hayden, Tom and Robert 118). The decision made by Bush's administration was legitimized by the threats made to start a war and thereby acting like a terrorist group resulting in endangering the lives of people.

The administration of Iraq believed that it was more powerful and therefore, could portray dictatorship virtues which could threaten the US putting it in doubt despite the belief that it is a strong and powerful state. The president carried out an analysis where he could make a decision based on the assumption that, Iraq could use the dangerous weapons to threaten the US and finally withdraw it from power. From the s perspective, presidential decisions are important and most effective in determining the kind of actions that can be taken. The leader is supposed to make the right decision which aims at protecting the wellness of the country and other close supporting countries.

The need to acquire skill in warfare and leadership made the US invade Iraq. The United States of America believes that there is no difference between an armed man and the one with no arms as long as appropriate skills are applied. The implication here was to bring down Iraq in the 2003 war with a strong perception that Saddam Hussein lacked adequate skills to counteract with his enemies. Instead, he gives threats despite having weapons that could assist him to bring the US and the coalition allies down. Bush is a leader, he organized his administration for survival, sovereignty and defense of the United States and other allies prior by engaging the military.

Bush administration targeted Iraq because of the US national interests. It believed that Iraq was the base of terrorist weapons and the US being a powerful and independent state, it had to seek for prestige destroy the arms. Consequently, Iraq had access to oil reserves which were among the interests of US administration. For Iraq to have this, it means that the natural resources will make it powerful hence being a threat to US powerful administration. It was, therefore, regarded by the US as a regional threat in the fact that it could easily access biological and chemical weapons which the US perceived as being the controller.

The liberalism reason in another approach influenced Bush administration to arrange for the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (Hayden, Tom and Robert 119). The US believed that war or conflict exists because of the lack of unity and harmony in a country. Saddam Hussein lacked leadership skills and therefore, making Iraq be less democratic in creating international peace. Instead, it could target the US and its allies for destruction so that it could be the only powerful dictatorship state in the world. The US, for this reason, could not allow it and therefore, pressing its interest from protecting such interests from being accomplished.

The Iraq government and its operations weakened international organizations and institutions international security council. As for international organizations, conflict is resolved using different institutions. The institutions organize for a meeting in order to determine important regulatory solutions. Leaders from all state could have a meeting at Azores Summit to discuss matters of international security but Hussein could not attend the meeting because he had a different interest from other nations. Lack of corporation in such a political anarchy made the US and other nations to conclude that, it was the right time for Iraq to be invaded because the plans of using a military power were unnecessary and unprotected.

The need to change world politics by the US attracted an invasion of Iraq in 2003. For all states, it was regarded by Fukuyama that democracy is a crucial thing that helps culminate world peace. The US, therefore, had priority roles which aimed at overthrowing nations that were not galvanized towards bringing international democracy and peace. This is however true, in the sense that, Iraq was not ready to comply with the interests of Fukuyama which was the major declaration to the end of cold war hence victory of the liberalism. This could ensure democracy is ascertained and therefore, have a role to play internationally. Iraq was not part of the program as it acted contrary to the achievement of international democracy.

The need to control economic resources was the in another approach another important reason for Iraq war. According to Marxism perspective, class inequality was the reason for the outbreak of conflict between these two states (Pfiffner 43). The war stated base of the US desire to liberate Iraq and take over the resources that it had acquired. Nations that had power in terms of resource control and domination had the power to make decisions hence making use of capitalism terminology. This kind of tactics that capitalist states use is powerful hence allowing it to decide over weak states and make effective decisions including control of every step. They are only aimed at their own good and making a profit from the process rather than the benefit of all but to Bush administration, it was important for the benefit of states that had come together to restore international peace.

The need to create free market economies internationally was the main aim of the US but to Iraq, it was not ready to comply with the interests. it can be that Hussein had realized the interest of US. It was, therefore, difficult for Bush the then US president to build a relationship with Iraq. The disagreement between the two states created conflicts hence inviting the US to the war. From this perspective, the US could not make profits from the conflict as it failed to control oil products and other natural resources that were used for international businesses. The conflict created was as a result of the disagreement in the fact that, the oil products were guided by Bush government troops and it was within the United States administration to take charge of such products internationally.

Terrorist attacks by Iraq could damage the world trade economic base which the United States had control and management over (Pfiffner 47). It was, therefore, necessary for invasion in the fact that, the war will neutralize the threats and conflicts. However, US believed that its tactics could work because it used soft power tactic to refer Iraq to the United Nations but the fighting back strategy created tension and opposition which is a real sense led to war. The war created opposition and therefore a threat to US inviting the US army to the war in order to neutralize it and create an environment which could lead to international peace.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the United States administration plan to invade Iraq was as a result of foreign policy decisions which created divided interests and competitions that appeared radical. Iraq's weapons for mass destruction created hollow which attracted the US to the war. The colocation explains reasons for Bush's administration to invade Iraq hence making it dominant and elevating the threats that were denounced by Hussein.

Works Cited

Hayden, Patrick, Tom Lansford, and Robert P. Watson. America's war on terror. Routledge, 2017.

Pfiffner, James P. "Did President Bush mislead the country in his arguments for war with Iraq?." Intelligence and national security policymaking on Iraq. Manchester University Press, 2018.

Pillar, Paul R. "Intelligence, policy, and the war in Iraq." Intelligence and national security policymaking on Iraq. Manchester University Press, 2018.