Introduction
Following the aftermath of the arrest of Dr. King, several reactions from the clergymen in Birmingham was evident in various ways. The main reason that led to the arrest of the King was that he led people parading without having obtained a permit, besides defying the order that had banned off demonstrations. Immediately after his arrest, eight white misters from Birmingham signed a letter that was titled "A Call for unity" that was at the same day printed in the "Birmingham News" and hence released to the public. The details of the letter entailed a call for the end of protests and also the demonstrations that were aimed at attaining civil rights in Birmingham. While in jail, the King responded through a letter to the letter that was earlier written by the clergymen as "A Call for Unity" whereby he critically detailed in why various issues seem quite controversial against the people's will and rights. In a nutshell, the king response was summarized as follows: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly (King Jr., 835)." This paper shall, therefore, carry out a rhetorical analysis of the letter, "Letter from Birmingham," critically basing the main arguments as a reference to the responses the king gave to the clergymen.
The use of parallelism genuinely cuts into the gathering of spectators mind the endless hardships blacks face and the emphasis makes it have all the earmarks of being a standard routine they endure. Dr. King in like manner fuses moral stories in his letter, for instance, when he says he sees "twenty million Negro kin covering in a fixed shut restrict of dejection in the center of an affluent society (King Jr. 383)." This portrayal paints a visual picture in the group's mind of the abuse they experience that seems to have no passage to getaway. They are constrained to look at the advantages and openings that the white people in their region have, and there is no possibility to get for them to achieve it. Moreover, by saying they are conned in a fixed closed pen, it dehumanizes the blacks and subjects them to animals without any rights. Since Dr. King used various illustrative devices in his letter, the gathering of observers considers him to be as continuously active since he has a singular association with seeing the disgracefulness blacks drive forward.
By his usage of parallelism and comparable qualities, the gathering of observers has an unrivaled cognizance of Dr. King conflict and as such can feel for him and support his authoritative goal. Dr. King is similarly prepared to understand the pursuer's thought and empower them to relate to what dim people have endured all through America with the use of delicacy. By strikingly portraying the viciousness, dishonor, and seriousness Dr. King has seen or encountered, the gathering of onlookers can all the more probable grasp the present issue and thus will more probable side with his perspectives and exercises rather than the clerics.
Due to the clerics' slant that the Birmingham police are keeping up control and deflecting viciousness, Dr. King says, "I question that you would have so vivaciously perceived the cops if you had seen its mutts plunging into unarmed, serene Negroes." it undeniably imparts the image in the peruser's mind (King Jr. 391). Using the words "sinking their teeth," "unarmed," and "quiet" makes the gathering of onlookers honestly watch the coldblooded mercilessness behind the police's exercises towards people who are tenderly testing. The all-inclusive community can see that while the police ensure they are giving protection for the system, they are in actuality merely doing naughtiness.
Dr. King moreover tells his gathering of observers that detachment and segregation impact everyone when he says, "Inappropriate behavior wherever is a hazard to value everywhere. We are gotten in a specific arrangement of shared characteristic, tied in a lone piece of the attire of destiny. Whatever impacts one direct, impacts all in an indirect manner (King Jr., 380)?" This shows everyone, paying little notice to race, is impacted by the terrible structure occurring during the 1960s. If a social affair of people is oppressed, the rest of the masses can't progress or succeed. In such a case, the gathering of onlookers will be continuously arranged to add to social change. Dr. King puts the effect of disengagement and bias on society with everything taken into account into perspective, and the perusers are directly prepared to see this deterrent that shields society from advancing too. From his use of estimation, the peruse can more readily agree with the truth being made and better prepared to feel for Dr. King and a considerable number of different people that experience this shamefulness.
In this entry, King's introduction of logos is virtuoso. He ejectively demonstrates the clergymen two sides of the network, the one of lack of concern and the other of contempt and negativity. In this selection, he doesn't endeavor to legitimize his thought processes but instead puts realities on the table so that the crowd could observe that his reaction was perfect. It is inferred with this explanation that King did not need to assume responsibility for the circumstance. He is essentially saying that regardless of whether he had picked to stay nonpartisan, Black Nationalist gatherings would have made a move in any case. Another occasion when Martin Luther King Jr. uses the strategy of legitimately tending to his group of spectators to exhibit his counter is evident in the piece of his letter stating, "You may well ask: 'Why direct activity? ... Isn't exchange an excellent way?' You are very right in calling, for arrangement." In this model, he likewise uses the advance to rationale as the principle spine of his contention; however, once in a while, interlaces poignancy and cunning word decision alongside the logos.
Dr. King first identifies the part of his rival's contention and gradually dismantles it. He achieves this by concentrating on "strain." According to the content, through a correlation of savage strain, which is undesired, and peaceful pressure, which is helpful, he step by step sets up the idea that the 'useful, peaceful strain' will, "help men ascend from the dull profundities of bias and prejudice to the great statures of comprehension and fraternity." King utilizes unparalleled word decision, for example, "dull profundities" also, "lofty statures," to precisely display his perspective.
Deductively, the shocking effort' communicates how sincerely exceptional the previous years have been for Negros and their failure to have a state in the 'monolog.' The consistent intrigue is additionally present since he unequivocally expresses the reason for their immediate activity program, which is to power an open entryway arrangement with the two sides having authority. Along these lines, he is endeavoring to make the "discourse" through the utilization of logos yet, also, joins word decision and feeling. Logos are available all through King's letter, and this is normal since the letter is a justification for his activities. "I have viewed the noteworthy layouts of her monstrous religious-training structures.
Works Cited
King Jr, Martin Luther. "Letter from Birmingham Jail." UC Davis L. Rev. 26 (1992): 835.
Cite this page
Birmingham Clergymen React to Arrest of Dr. King - Essay Sample. (2023, Jan 28). Retrieved from https://midtermguru.com/essays/birmingham-clergymen-react-to-arrest-of-dr-king-essay-sample
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the midtermguru.com website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay on How Reformation Led to Democracy
- Essay on Political Party Bias in the Media
- Interactive Communication Model - Essay Sample
- Suicide as Escape From Self - Literary Analysis Essay
- A Historical Milestone: Ratifying the U.S. Constitution - Essay Sample
- Paper Example on Issues that Affect Large Group of People
- Compare and Contrast Essay on Jeffersonian and Jacksonian Democracy