Common Sense - Literary Analysis Essay

Introduction

Common sense book was released in 1776, and it emerged as a best seller in the state of Philadelphia in the united states of America during that period. Philadelphia was occupied by the Lepage people who were very religious and lived without any fear because of their staunch beliefs. The book was released in January of that year, and by April it had reached almost one hundred and twenty sold copies because the book had very clear, direct and steady arguments. There were two main arguments that Thomas Paine majored in, in the book; democratic republic creation as the independence from London. This book was written during a critical situation in the united states of America, and it advocated towards the gain of indigence from Great Britain together with other thirteen colonies. This book is said to have helped in swinging the people into supporting the idea. It was during that time of the occasions that led to the American revolutionary war. This book was the motivator or mind changer that led to the people fighting for their independence.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Thomas Paine, according to the pamphlet of common he claimed that is wasn't the right of the Britain colonists to control the united states of America and it was time that they left. This was the first book that was written asking for the independence of the country. This means that Thomas Paine was a courageous man and he though well of the American citizens. He felt that the great Britain colonists were not treating the Americans right and that the country should be governed by its citizens. This book revolved around religion, and government relating to the colonial situation of the country at that time. He describes society as the accomplished of all things that are good and constructive that are done in unity. The government, on the other side, is the organizations that defend the people from wicked behaviors. The government should be able to protect life property and give people their freedom or independence, something which the great Britain colonist wasn't offering He thought that the people, as well as him, should have those rights from the government. In the books, he said and believe that people are happy if they are part of making the rules that they live by. He was against too much power in leadership as he believed in equality. In this book, Thomas Pain portrays everyone as equal unless the Britain colonists who were not fair to the people as they had too much over the land that was not theirs. It t is fair to portray all people as equal despite their race, gender, or origin.

Thomas pain had another book titled " The Rights of Man.". in this book he argued that a revolution of political power is allowed if a government is in place doesn't protect the rights of the people. He believes that people should govern themselves, and the government should just offer protection. He advocates for the freedom of speech, the freedom to religion. Thomas Paine believed in a revolution in both America and Europe. He was from Europe; he was at a time imprisoned in France and also rejected in American history. He portrayed the African Americans as slaves who were in most cases owned by the native Americans; the women were strong beings and courageous though they were treated badly by the intruders. The colonizers mistreated even the native Americans. Thomas Paige was an outsider in the land of the United States of America but fought for the rights and freedom of the country as well as other European countries. He believed everyone was equal.

Domestic Manners of the Americans, Frances Trollope

This was travel written in 1832 by Frances Trollope, a mother to Anthony Trollope who grew to be a highly recognizable author of his time. She wrote it to tell her story about travels in the country and the Cincinnati where she resided. She was from Europe and as other authors had traveled to a country that was a couple of years older than herself. Ms. Trollope had traveled to America in November of 1827 accompanied by her three children arriving at The Mississippi that Christmas. She came to be known as Fanny for her smooth approach towards illustrations and symbolization of features and events on her books through the ballpoint of her pen. Most authors recall her thirty-two books as being lively despite lacking the rather common thoughtful nature of literature at that time.

Through the book Domestic Manners of Americans, Frances was able to become the breadwinner in the family while keeping the family afloat poverty. The book, however, did become highly controversial in both America and Britain at that time. People bought the book at times just to burn it in America, but as a result, she would acquire more wealth as this generated income for her through sales. What Frances thought of the Americans always seemed to be of a conservative opinion with strong disgust towards behavioral growth, evangelism, and slavery. Like other authors, she felt the American culture and government, which was affected by her reality living on the distracting personal life and financial troubles.

In her first chapters, Fanny seemed to be drawn to the geographical terrain of America that began with the strong visuals of the Mississippi as they approached the shores. She never seems to miss the fact that the people have abandoned the environmental duties through disregard and disrespect to such a beautiful place. This draws to her belief of dismal behavior of the people and needs to emphasize learning and mannerism from the British system. Even in such strongly written poetic illustrations of sight, one can not help but smile under her witty words seeking the imagination of the reader. She is keen and meticulous with her definitions while slowly walking you through her timeline in this book.

Over the next several chapters,s Fanny is seen scouring other lands in America trying to experience different cultures and society. She tries hard to entertain her three kids through it all while managing to document her travels. Through her journey, she did try to make conversations with other people more often to suggest she was so interested in learning the little anyone knew if it so lied within the scope of American travels. She does meet several Englanders on her journey who are constantly enlightening her on society mechanisms manifested in this great land. She learns of unhygienic practices but weighs the thought of indecency away after placing it against performance, further letting readers accustom to her realistic thinking through her life choices.

At Cincinnati, Fanny takes time to attend a couple of meetings and listen to key speakers. She learns of the great interest in the people to learn the art from foreigners in large numbers and cooperation from other artists to promote the skill in the region. She, however, fails to conclude on the methods by which the society lives on religion being just a suggestion to the way of life. She cannot also seem to fathom how the most respectable of all residents seem to be of unethical practices while not gunning hatred but respect and honor from fellow friends. She finds Americans to be cruel to fellow compatriots and practicing slave labor on unremorseful lengths that could be seen as inconsiderate to even the most ruthless of Europeans.

Fanny learns of the poor interest in the society to educate in both skills and wisdom the ladies in the town through few or at times no places of gathering. She identified ministers to be the major influencers to such groups which she identified as being dangerous as it would be very easy for brainwashing and detouring honest thoughts and concerns away from the minds of the major societal percentage of the mass.

Through the journey in her book, Frances would worry about her kids getting sick and the kind of medical attention they were receiving. At a point when her son falls ill, she does discredit the doctor's prescriptions as being unproportionate to the severity of the illness but chooses to believe in the professionalism by raising doubts in her own medical experience through her life. Through this behavior, it is noticeable she is of an open mind character and thus flexible to view and document her experience to the readers of the book with some extent of impartiality.

As cited by Fanny, the market day seemed to be a free day for all type of people, male-female, young and old, to meet at one place. The freedom through which sellers seemed to sell their commodity seemed to entice Farnnice as holding some originality and creativity to even the local buyers. She did, however, think the wisest of all in the market were those that left after trading rather than those who came to the market to purchase. Through this, most readers would be presumed as enraged since sellers usually turn out to be lesser than consumers in any society. This opinion demonstrated in her book would also not settle well as she shortly admits to her dislike for hogs that the local people happen to be an appetite for. This expresses the thought of her expressing superiority of European nature upon the local society as she admits to a stronger preference towards European culture of vegetables and trading system.

Frances was always eager to meet up with other authors and engage in their literature preferences. She did so over dialogues and meals to enjoy it as freely as she could. It would be noted she was warmer towards people in the same skillset over other kinds. She learned of the great power literature in newspaper and magazines attracted anyone that could read due to the somewhat great composition of intent and words to bring about a 'tasteful' story out of any story. She at times thought newspapers in America could be considered magazines as they could be read anywhere and anytime. They appeared to be of unlimited attendance to educate and entertain its readers.

Frances considered the poverty difference to be something that would limit integration between individuals but was once surprised by a couple to learn of their disregard to such difference. The warmth she received would always shock her as it all seemed too unreal in practice. This was a notable difference between her origin and the newly visited places. She did receive motherly kindness towards her kids even though she thought of herself as the only person capable of looking after her kids with love at the foremost line of intent. She does show anger towards the numerous random visits she receives from neighbors that guide her thoughts towards making her house private. This thought, however, is quickly overturned by the ripple effect of receiving hatred from neighbors by such actions. She considers it hard if not impossible for her to fully do anything she wishes due to public persecution that she is warned of by a local. She came to learn of the differences in hospitality that she was accustomed to offering visitors in Europe in that in America It was never important to maintain or attend to visitors while in Europe it would be crucial to make at least conversation if they maintained their stay. She admits this was hard to understand all through as much as interfering personal conversations never seemed to bother the local community.

America was founded with a constitution that preferred the absence rather than the presence of religion in it. Frances thought this was not necessary but admits that if the religious leaders preferred it that way, then it would have been possible to transform the society. The freedom of religious beliefs allowed for uncountable roots of religious factions within the society to function independently. She shows admiration for the Catholic church to hold one leader through whom others look for directives allowing to uniformity in the church. She considers this to lead its followers in a clear pat...