Conflict Between Aboriginals and Non-Aboriginals in Canada: Analysis of Culture & Disputes - Essay Sample

Introduction

In the sequential paper section 2, the main focus was on the conflicts that existed between the minority Aboriginal group from Canada and the non-aboriginals. The bone of contention was that these two groups disagreed over the issues of land. The Aboriginals felt that the non-aboriginals were infringing their rights by taking advantage of their natural resources and wanting to dig tunnels that would pass through their lands. In this section, the analysis of the culture and conflict of these people looks into the suitable recommendation that would create a peaceful co-existence between these two people.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The only solution that could help deal with this problem would be to give the Aboriginals land - not just a small piece, but a very big piece of land. This provision should aim to establish a potential modern nation (Lake and Lewis 20). As much as the Aboriginals of Canada make up approximately 4.3% of the country's population, giving them back a quarter portion of the country would be an ideal solution to end this problem. These people should have the giant territory of the land from Labrador around James, towards the Hudson Bay and to and to the oil sands in the Northern Alberta. The lands should go beyond the Northern Alberta and expand in North West Territories (Lake and Lewis 18). This action would give the aboriginals in Quebec hydro-electric resources. The Alberta oil sands and salt water port of Manitoba in Churchill appear to be an ample space and could accommodate approximately 1.4 million people. This action would give the Canadian residents peace and tranquillity.

The approaches that the government and the international community should take in relation to resolving this conflict is that, they should refrain from proposing the construction of pipelines that pass through the Aboriginal land (Danesh, Roshan, and Jessica 67). As long as such constructions receive opposition from the aboriginals, the government should completely refrain taking actions that would agitate these people. If these natives wanted to disrupt the operations of the country, they would easily cut all the major rail lines, gas pipelines, roads, oil pipelines, and electric transmission (Danesh, Roshan, and Jessica 67). To avoid all these, it is important for the government to ensure that it protects the rights of the aboriginals.

The government should fund these people as much as it can. It should always ensure that it includes the aboriginals in its funding, in terms of development. The government should also ensure that it enlightens the aboriginals on the need of developments like infrastructure. In this way, this group of people will have all the knowledge that they need to accept the developments that will come their way (Jones 69). In some cases, the government officials should spend these people a visit and talk with them. They should not only talk to them through their leaders but should ensure that there is a section of some people who will be present when they talk. These talks should aim towards building a consensus (Jones 86). They should come up with solutions that will help them have a peaceful co-existence. Moreover, the government should take the initiative to ensure that it tries to enlighten these people on some essential prospects of their well-being. Thus, as much as the government should give them fund, it should also legislate what they do with the fund.

The other solution that the government and the international community can take is that they should allow these natives to indulge in activities that they are good at. These activities entail managing the natural resources. This fact of the maintenance of natural resources is obvious because of the surrounding that these people live. They are used to dealing with the flora and the fauna, and therefore they know how to handle them better. The government should not exploit the natural resources in their lands because this is what creates tension in their territories. Therefore, the government should ensure that it supports these natives in the ventures that they plan to undertake. When these natives see that the government supports them, they will feel like they are part of the nation and will stop rebelling against some venture that will benefit the people.

From the previous assignments, it is clear that these native people are the ones who are rebellious. They do no[t want the non-aboriginals to get into their lands because some years back, the aboriginals barred them from entering their land. So it is kind of a tit for tat mission. They have become rigid and are not ready to let go of the bitterness that they have (Danesh, Roshan, and Jessica 67). Thus, the government and the international body should try to talk them into doing away with the bitterness that they have. If they succeed in doing this, the aboriginals will be able to accommodate the non-aboriginals and they will co-exist peacefully.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the government and the international community can indulge in various activities that will bring the natives to an understanding with the aboriginals. It is upon them to find out which way will work the best. By so doing, they will reduce the conflicts that have always existed for a long time and this will be to the benefit of Canada as a whole.

Works Cited

Danesh, Roshan, and Jessica Dickson. "Alternative Dispute Resolution and Aboriginal-Crown Reconciliation in Canada." in Mediation, 2015, pp. 67.

Jones, Kent Douglas. Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms to Define Aboriginal Parcel Boundaries in Canada. Diss. University of Calgary, 2017.

Lake, C., and Z. Lewis. "Alternative mechanisms for dispute resolution with Aboriginal communities: Traditional decision making in the Coast North Shore Region." Victoria, BC: University Of Victoria (2017).