Factors That Cause Violent Crimes and Factors That Lowers Them - Essay Sample

Introduction

In the modern community violence and criminal activities have been caused by various instigating factors. Reduction and increase of criminal activities in the society are addressed using the aspect of violent criminal acts in resolving post-conflict. The review by Towers, Chen, Malik, & Ebert, (2018) theorizes reduction of violent criminal acts in social reconciliation to restructure civil justice. Towers, Chen, Malik, & Ebert, (2018) perceive the measures of reducing violent criminal acts as a revolution from the traditional perspective of religious reconciliation into the end of vicious cycles of revenge illustrated in the paradigm of reconciliation justice. The paper begins with defining the concept of violent criminal acts based on social reconciliation framework. Justice is a colloquial fairness for long and short-term solutions of violent criminal acts, social identity, and politics in post-conflict regimes.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Mair and Mair (218) mention reconciliation with or without violent criminal acts to rebuild continuous phases of solutions between conflicting relationships and discouraging revenge. In the analysis, Freidman (1453) encompass reconciliation with lasting political, social and economic process that transits between personal relations. Fair and unfair treatment of both the victim and the perpetrator builds the foundations of negotiating significant social stratification towards violent criminal acts. The article relays the interaction of key issues that help to identify and reorganize priorities when dealing with sensitive social problems that instigate conflict. The possibility of looking for solutions in conflict needs to ensure the satisfaction of all involved parties without favoring any one over others. The process of reconciliation through violent criminal acts is seen in this article to reduce victimization but, promote proper relations during a post-conflict transition in the struggle of lasting peaceful coexistence.

Special interest groups dealing with crime reduction are also termed to as pressure groups. They constitute of individuals or collective persons with the ability to control or influence legislative authority. Special interest groups dealing with crime reduction do not necessarily advocate for general public interest. They share a specific interest in the bid to promote a certain trade or industry (Goetz, 147). While as coalitions are mergers or alliances of two political camps to form either a permanent or temporary union for a common vested interest. These faction partnerships are formed on the virtual of convenience due to the overlapping interests that join the party members. Every individual is entitled to engage actively in political leadership by being an active member of either camp. Belonging to a crime eradication coalition that is a platform to air personal take on legislative representation.

Crime reduction dealing with crime reduction and coalitions play an active role in ensuring political growth on any nation or organization. However, the two differ in three distinct ways due to their composition and role in the political drive. The life cycle of both constituents is based on their principle formation theme. Interest groups are mainly found to exist for shorter life spans than coalitions due to changes in political heat (Freakonomics, 132). Crime reduction dealing with crime reduction is rather smaller in sizes than coalitions since they can be made up of an individual. Also, coalitions are founded on believes, ideologies and principles to advocate for social rights while crime reduction dealing with crime reduction are founded professional or federal pursuit (Friedman 225). Interest groups, coalitions, and political action committee play a similar role as linkage institutions. Though, political action committee differs from other linkage camps due to its role, time frame, and deployment. It is, therefore, possible to conclude that political action committees are more legitimate than interest groups and coalitions on the nature of the political system operate.

Mair and Mair perceive justice as a representation of fairness to benefit both sides of the coin without favoritism (206). The victim and the perpetrator in social, political and economic order do not find an automatic solution to their post-conflict relationship but, builds a lasting reconciliation between all parties. The implication of conflict bases social psychoanalysis on how justice and fairness intertwine as people of different perceptions engage in conflict and social interactions. Fair judgment stabilizes the status of impartiality and peacekeeping among individuals or groups in post-conflict situations. The article portrays the different forms of victimization that directly or indirectly influences cooperation towards lasting peace of former enemies.

However, the article makes deliberate assumptions when identifying victims and perpetrators in conflict situations. Mair and Mair show less concern on the labeling of violence victims to address interrelation grievances (Kalvin & Bierman 569). The vulnerable presumes the social identification of victims without necessarily analyzing their role in instigating conflict. The article fails to demonstrate the physical reality of the effectiveness of justice without considering social stratification to identify the conflicted parties. Though, Mair and Mair have tried to provide ample evidence on the perception of justice as a formal way of addressing to violent criminal acts, emotional reality of the affected truth is overlooked (211). The ritual of violent criminal acts is presented more in a religious perspective presenting a misconception on the emotional and social perspective of violent criminal acts.

The political philosophy of viewing violent criminal acts as presented in the article debates on the development of justice focusing on reconciliation institutions. Kalvin and Bierman (577) revolve around the best ways of ensuring perfect solutions in conflict situations. Though the resources convey the rational on the principles of justice and reconciliation, the works are not convincing on how functional the application of violent criminal acts builds cohesion among groups of conflicting personas. The article deliberately ignores the complexities on social inequalities among individuals of different social status and the accepted principles of violent criminal acts. Mair and Mair dictate that conflicting people should let go and pick up pieces as they reconstruct future relationship with each other (213). This perception is, however, not practical as the principles and paradigms of social justice do not only revolve around fairness. It also incorporated other aspects like choices, acceptance, and division as elements of justice in reconstructing post-conflict reconciliation.

Freakonomics work forms a better basis for the philosophical view of dealing with social conflict and fairness to retaliate the notion of societal order (123). Further scholars get an evolutional concept in defining and application of the tenets of social recovery from unjust socialization. Professional philosophers and sociologists can base their arguments in the pursuit of significant understanding of the contribution on fair reconciliation paradigm. The articles' integration of religious and social aspects of violent criminal acts and revenge opens a new page of dealing with violent criminal acts and revenge. In a new environment predecessors of Mair and Mair's work should create new platforms to strengthen the theories of conflict used in the article or disagree with the perception of reconciliation, conflict, violent criminal acts, fairness, and justices to the evolution of conflict in modern society. To achieve accurate identification and desired social norms in violent criminal acts, a new sociological concept of justice should be developed to show a more precise dimension of creating awareness of the social disorder. Policy formulation should take root in the clarification of the peace process so as to draw amicable reconciliation dynamics without executing oppressions to either member of the conflicting group.

Using the arguments of Tower, Chen, Malik, and Ebert a communist will generate a lasting solution to the cycles of revenge by identification of causes of conflict and assessing the magnitude of the impact it inflicts on people living in conflict with each other (2018). Drawing a lasting solution will not only require making a just solution or peaceful reconciliation but, also be identifying possible renewal of revenge cycles. The prosecution of perpetrators and compensations of victims needs to go beyond the material gain both parties suffer or gain but the psychological harmony of living with each other in future without any bitter regrets.

According to Kelvin and Bierman's factors influencing criminal activities are two overlapping conditions in life. Secrecy ensures that information is not let out to the general public, whilst crime reduction keeps control over the limitation of accessing private information. The two conditions are propounded individual rights. However, the two have very distinctive differences. For instance, crime reduction has set boundaries that limit categorized persons to access private information. On the other hand, secrecy has elaborate boundaries where top secrets are totally sealed from disclosure. Breaking a secret damages relations more than invading crime reduction as secretly held information could be damaging or betraying.

Handling governmental and private information in crime reduction is critical to ensure personal success at their place of work. Every one is liable to safeguard community in crime reduction is upheld at all times. Indecent exposure of other people's private information especially on social media can cause a lot of damage. For instance, upon crossing paths with private information about a co-worker on social media, it is wise to first ensure that you enlighten the concerned party on the existence of such information. This move would help to stop further spread of the private information. Working together with the affected party to ensure that private information is wiped out of the public domain. This moral support will help the victim to safeguard exposure of sensitive information that would jeopardize their performance at work.

Employers scrutinize employees to ensure crime reduction to gain confidentiality within its manpower, but in certain instances, some sensitive private information could cost employees job security. Therefore, co-workers need to handle each other's effort in 'crime reduction with a lot of discreetness to reduce alleged interceptions. Sourcing co-workers' private information is treated under the statutory law as federal offense depending on how the information was acquired, used or distributed. Though accessing private information on social media cannot be classified as an offense against others' privacy, use of the said information to your advantage can lead to the violation of other person privacy. Distribution of co-workers' private information can cost their working credibility in the organization. Thus, it is important to find the basis of such information before passing it on to others or even using it to your advantage over others.

Conclusion

Conclusively, violence and criminal activities have been caused by various instigating factors. Reduction and increase of criminal activities in the society are addressed using the aspect of violent criminal acts in resolving post-conflict. The measures of reducing violent criminal acts as a revolution from the traditional perspective of religious reconciliation into the end of vicious cycles of revenge illustrated in the paradigm of reconciliation justice. The efforts to en...