Human Trafficking: Examining the Role of Beliefs - Essay Sample

Introduction

The human sex trafficking entails the transportation, harboring, transfer as well as receipt of persons using threat, abduction or deception for the purpose of offering illegal sex in exchange of money (Wilson et al., 2006). It is imperative to note that the concept of human sex trafficking is a global menace which is influenced by societal, religious and political beliefs. Fundamentally, this paper intends to explore on how beliefs influence the general perception with regards to human trafficking. It is imperative to note that, human trafficking is a form of human slavery, which involves sexual exploitation subjecting the victims to both physical injuries, health complications as wells gross violation of human rights. Since the general perception on the human sex trafficking is greatly influenced by both myths and beliefs, the entire society should be enlightened to adopt positive practices to help curb menace as the whole among the population (Wilson et al., 2006).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

To begin with, my strong innate belief on the whole idea of human sex trafficking is shaped by the Christianity prospects (Hopper& Hidalgo, 2006). Significantly, there is a compact connection between Christian beliefs and the whole vice of human trafficking. Notably, biblical teachings and expectations form the source of my strong perception on the fact that the human sex trafficking which involves the selling and trading of the human body for purposes of sex is a gross violation of human rights. This blatant attack on human dignity and the reality is that human sex trafficking turns both women and young girls into sex commodities which are to be bought and sold used and discarded.

The religious belief which is firmly pegged on the sanctity of the human life right from birth to death and hence does not concur with the illicit trade of human sex trafficking (Hopper& Hidalgo, 2006). It is strongly believed that human trafficking destroys the social image, which was created by the almighty God. Tentatively, from personal experiences, it is revealed that several communities suffer purposely from the illicit trade of human trafficking. In the United States analysis projects the human sex trafficking between 15,000 women and 50,000 girls yearly. This is a clear revelation that even in robust economies such as the U.S has this illicit trade going on.

On the other hand, religious belief and the spiritual notion that values both the male and female created in God's image thus contributing unique qualities to sexuality and relationship has poised a tremendous impact on my general perception on human sex trafficking (Hopper& Hidalgo, 2006). Sadly, the global sex trafficking industry thrives on the idea that humans are mere commodities that can be used and discarded anyhow. This renders the Christian message to stack in the dark of opposition. Therefore this sexual exploitation can only be combated when the Christians live by this message.

Personal Reflection

Personally, my current belief that human sex trafficking is a gross violation of humanity has dramatically been shaped by ideological teachings I received in Christian teachings. I dearly, since the Christian beliefs shun the entire illicit trade, by current perspective has been developed towards that line and view the human sex trafficking as a violation of humanity which require stringent legislative laws. On the other hand, the teachings and the belief that domestic and international sex trafficking is an amoral concern has dramatically shaped my perspective to fight in a bid to eradicate this menace by proposing adoption of relevant legislative laws.

References

Hopper, E., & Hidalgo, J. (2006). Invisible chains: Psychological coercion of human trafficking victims. Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev., 1, 185.

Wilson, D. G., Walsh, W. F., & Kleuber, S. (2006). Trafficking in human beings: Training and services among US law enforcement agencies. Police Practice and Research, 7(02), 149-160.