Research Paper on International Relation: War Between the U.S. And North Korea

Introduction

The international relation is mainly concerned with related issues across borders of a state. It involves economics, politics, and at time law issues. International relations promote trade policies among states, it aims at encouraging travels that are related to immigration, tourism, and business hence enhancing people's lives by providing opportunities. It also allows states to pool resources, collaborate with each other and share information on how to face global issues like terrorism and pandemics. This analysis aims at exploring the war between the U.S. and North Korea as a current international relation and how the theory of realism is seen.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Realism mainly focuses on the concept that nations work in order to increase their own power comparative to others, for instance, states seek power to protect themselves. Realism reflects the world's reality, and more efficiently accounts for a change in universal conflicts (Dobson 77). It gained momentum during the second world war when it seemed to offer a considerable account for why and how this war followed a period of imaginary optimism and peace. North Korea has demanded the US to join South and North Korea in affirming an end to the Korean War. The war, however, halted in 1953, nonetheless, a peace accord was never contracted (Blair 64). There is a probability of war between the US and North Korea whereby President Trump of the US threatened to abolish North Korea if the US was enforced to protect itself. North Korea, therefore, must try everything to avoid the conflict with the US. The US asserts that before giving way any concerns to North Korea, it must do extra to keep the deal on denuclearization to an end, however, North Korea accused the US of demanding a lot while offering few concerns in dialogs over the issue.

The United States called North Korea to submit a full record of its nuclear package for confirmation and afterward start pulling apart its nuclear and projectile amenities. North Korea, however, did not agree to the US demand claiming that it cannot bargain something chip for denuclearization. They claimed that if the US does not want to end the war, then North Korea will not hope for it. This will, therefore, force North Korea to have a hard bargain on changing the terms of denuclearization since it's hard for it to give up its nuclear weapons (Pollack 56). With time, however, North Korea demonstrated readiness to transfer toward denuclearization since President Kim offered to thrash the main missile expansion facilities by including a test site for missile appliance and also invite specialists from outside to watch. Mr. Kim also presented to dismantle permanently North Korea's main nuclear complex. These gestures, however, did not fulfill United Nation's demands since North Korea did not offer a complete commitment to pull to pieces its nuclear collection and did not submit its nuclear inventory to be confirmed by international assessors. North Korea claimed that the U.S. behaved unsatisfactory by encouraging them to take bigger steps to denuclearization and insisted that the U.S. should have made a declaration on the end of war long ago rather than trying to use it as bartering mark. Analysts, however, fear that North Korea would use the declaration to the end of the war as a validation to raise its operation for the removal of many American multitudes based in the South. From this, realism suggests that leaders recognize the issue of national interest as they attempt to manage their nation's affairs, no matter what their political persuasion in order to survive in a competitive environment.

Realists believe that appetite for power, selfishness and the inability to trust others lead to predictable outcomes. This is the reason why war has become a common thing in history just like the war between the U.S. and North Korea where the US is selfish and determined on becoming the most powerful forcing North Korea to denuclearize (Gauthier 86). Both North Korea and the US have an issue with trust since one finds that, North Korea demanded that the U.S. has not done sufficient to inspire them to take braver steps to denuclearization. The U.S. stresses that North Korea did not offer a comprehensive commitment to pulling to pieces its nuclear assortment and did not succumb its nuclear record to be verified. For those reasons, it's becoming tough to end the war. Leaders also influence the realist account of politics for they are concerned in promoting national security. In that respect, President Trump is focusing on how North Korea can put the war to an end and how human characteristics can influence the nation's security.

According to realism, lack of balance of power shows a situation that states are making choices in order to increase their own abilities whereas undermining the abilities of others. Like in this case, the United States is introducing the idea of North Korea denuclearizing which will put it at an inferior position, therefore, making the U.S. have power over North Korea. The balance of power, nevertheless, can bring a situation where no state is allowed to get too powerful than others in the international system. In most cases, if a state attempts to push its luck much trying to overcome the other, it will trigger a war. For this reason, it can be hard to end the war between the U.S. and North Korea. Realism talks of flexible alliances for the balance of power to ensure survival (Gauthier 87). For instance, if the United States and the North Korean governments could form an alliance balancing power among them, this can end the war among them completely.

Realists believe that realism theory describes closely the world politics image that is held by consultants of government. Realism for that case should be utilized in the process of policy making like the United States' government and North Korea's should apply it I making a policy of how to end the war for good. Realism's critics, however, argue that realists can help in disseminating violent as well as selfish nature of humankind and the absence of pyramid in the national system (Gauthier 88). Realists, therefore, encourage leaders to always act in a way that is based on power, force, and suspicion. From this, if the two presidents from the United States and North Korea can apply this tactic, it could be very easy to end the war and, therefore, making realism a fulfilling prediction. According to realists, however, leaders are faced with many constraints and a few opportunities for collaboration just like North Korea's leaders found it difficult to cooperate with the United States on the issue of denuclearization.

Conclusion

From the above discussion, realism claims to enlighten the reality of universal politics. The highest goal for the realists is to ensure the survival of the nation and, therefore, nation's actions are judged conferring to responsibility ethics instead of by moral principles. Appetite for power, selfishness and the inability to trust others lead to war among nations, however, lack of balance of power shows a situation that declares a lifetime war. Realism for that case should be utilized in the process of policy-making and as a result encourage leaders to always act in a way that is based on balanced power, force, and suspicion.

Works Cited

Blair, Clay. The forgotten war: America in Korea, 1950-1953. Anchor, 1989.

Dobson, Alan P. "Realism (International Relations)." policy 66 (2002): 77.

Gauthier, Brandon K. "North Korea, and the World: Human Rights, Arms Control, and Strategies for Negotiations, written by Walter C. Clemens Jr." Journal of American-East Asian Relations 24.1 (2017): 86-88.

Pollack, Jonathan D. No exit: North Korea, nuclear weapons, and international security. Routledge, 2017.