Theodor Adorno: Human Suffering & Social Change - Essay Sample

Introduction

Theodor Adorno a known Philosopher wrote a very wide range of subjects where his fundamental concern was about human suffering in relation to modern societies effects on the conditions of humans. He played a role as a member of The Institute of Social Research concerned with cultural intellectual hub and also social science to help in overthrowing capitalism and promoting socialism among members of the society. The institute was responsible for the creation of critical theory which helped in identifying and knowing the causes of oppression creation which it defined them keenly, the causes include; culture, materialism, economics and lastly politics which were later maintained significantly through consciousness method. There was a deviation of the institute earlier before from orthodox Maxims due to an argument concerning that cultural and social factors that contributed towards oppression as one of the economics phases.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Adorno however generally contributed largely in the critical theory, after noticing that his view towards it was the reason caused by suffering and dominations among individual members. The philosopher came up with the word 'identity thinking' in order to come up with a clear description of the processes involved in categorical thinking of modern society at large. This was due to the fact that everything individually had become an abstract example and this lead to no allowances and existence of any individual uniqueness. He claimed that the human race had however gone further mile of the understanding world through myth instead of understanding it through scientific reasoning.

The two modes later provided a viewpoint that the subjective was to directly conform to the outside world which had no control at all. Adorno saw the morality of this as somehow stuck within some powerless subjective in relation to his argument. The philosopher is however known for a critique of 'industrial culture'. He had a feeling that the modernized community entertainment industry was just formulaic, dominating and mechanical as how the workplace is. He produced an argument that modern society members had to work and at the same time enjoy their leisure well according to their program (Jacobs, 2015). Moreover, he said that no place was present of individuals been free who are able and can confidently take part in society creation, whether at play or work.

However, I personally agree with Adorno argument, that every member of society has that ability and capability to ensuring better creation of a society which at later times ensures effective and efficient economic growth in a State(Couldry,2012). Adorno's argument provided a room for motivating individuals where each and every member should always know the important side of the philosopher of focusing on their own goals.

Furthermore, Dr. Lev Manovich, one of the theorists of worldwide digital culture came up with an idea analysis of contemporary culture through the use of data science. He is known as an author of almost thirteen books which were most suggestive of the media history(Keltie,2017). The theorist is known to be a professor of computer science and a director Cultural Analytic lab that visualized the use of computation methods to analyze visual culture datasets in humanities. He taught different classes of different universities in different units like new media theory, digital humanities and digitalized arts(Manovich,2009). He provided appropriate information towards helping members in using and applying digitalized means of media to promote the growth of the economy. He played a very important role in giving society the best means of gaining valuable tactics of enhancing means towards a growing economy. I personally agree with the theorist in relation to generation and coming up of the ideas that are best to be used by individualists in society.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the philosophers and the theorist had the best ideas and played a very crucial role to help the state grow profitably stable with high revenues, maximum incomes, and fewer expenses.

References

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity.

Jacobs, R. N. (2015). From mass to public: Rethinking the value of the culture industry. In Culture, Society, and Democracy (pp. 107-134). Routledge.

Keltie, E. (2017). The culture industry and participatory audiences. Springer.

Manovich, L. (2009). The practice of everyday (media) life: From mass consumption to mass cultural production? Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 319-331.