Essay on Controversial Sexual Orientation in the Society

Could it be our sexuality differ and deviate along the growth line of our behavior and socialization since childhood? That is a great controversy that needs to be explored in depth to eliminate confusion and illuminate the truth. Heterosexuality is normal in our societies. However, some of the unique sexual behavior and character possessed by us in the societies emerge endless questions in our mind. Heterosexuals do not engage in discussion on the matter of causatives of our polarity, but they just conclude it as a cultural erosion. That comes when we take part in sexual act especially between men and women. However besides sexual acts, heterosexual may come about feminism, that is fighting for some right. That reveals as either acting aggressively, and mass movement or formation of elites. The arguments and stands are enumerated by discussions below.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

First, sexuality molds as we continue to grow. According to the case discussed by Messner, we grow up initially admiring our colleague (Messner, 1992: 229). The case of Messner and Timmy makes them grow together but with hitches between them as basketball players. The author indicates although they grow as friends initially, there is a natural segregation on the matter of sex pertaining the masculinity. The author still tries to gang against his colleague Timmy to impeach him (Messner, 1992: 229). It explains how our sexual normality or being heterosexual come about along our growth besides having a misunderstanding in the early stage of our lives. That means the changes come out naturally and the act of normality result later in life. During the initial stages of our lives, one may not harbor enough knowledge on some matters. However, upon being enlightened, self-realization and interpersonal dynamics can lead to normality eventually.

Second, the normality of sexuality seems comfortable, and manageable in life. Most of us handle heterosexuality as normal in life. However, the minority who engage in the same sexuality sees themselves abnormal (Messner, 1992: 230). Normally the same sex individuals would not like to be referred to as deviants. According to the case study about Tom Waddell, he knows about his sexual identity, but he hardly wants to reveal the status publicly (Messner, 1992, pg. 230). Tom Waddell even mimics the normality of his society just to hide reality. That shows he feels uncomfortable within our community. The hind-outs indicates homosexuality despite being referred to as a behavior acquired along with our lives it is a deviation from the norm in the society.

Third, some identified activities remain institutions through which we get sexual orientation. According to the two case study by Messner, athletics and dances refer to activities that can apparently bring out the sexuality identification (Messner, 1992: 230). Therefore, to men mostly the heterosexuality masculinity stands out in athletics. An act to show-off with a capability is a behavior manifested to us, and hence we feel a sense of recognition which seems normal. Contrary with that, Waddell's case seems different in that, he likes to dance, and that is seen as weird act among men in the society by then. That even repels him away from his hobby and career (Messner, 1992: 230). However, this seems not wholly satisfying since we have different talents and we hold unique abilities despite our sexual identification. For instance, not only in sports, men can show their heterosexuality masculinity. A man can be talented in dance but still be heterosexual. That cannot link him with an assumption that he is a gay or behaving to become a transgender.

Lack of explicit definition about heterosexuality formerly led to emergence of the misunderstanding after emergence of the other extreme as homosexuality. During early times, there existed even no word that can refer to those who practiced homosexuality. It is after the invention and definition of the word homosexual according to Zevallos that Queen Victoria orders the physicians to search about the behavior. Queen Victoria seems not pleased about it, and that is when a counter-position came in for homosexual' as heterosexual.' Homosexuality seemed like a disease to cure as early as the eighteenth century after which it was outlawed later mostly in white settings (Zevallos, n.d: para. 5). Due to ignorance and failure to set boundaries, the behavior has spread enormously to the point of great concern in our communities. It might be because homosexuality bothers us, no rule against it, and does not violate another person's right or comfort that it has taken foundation in the society.

The sexual orientation is more of natural than of socialization construction. Sex study conducted over 19300 Australians indicated about 97% of them exhibited heterosexuality, whereas the rest practice homosexuality. To the same figure, 7% to men and 13% towards women once became attracted to a partner of the same sex women being in a greater influence than men later in life. That indicates the larger percentage of people act whereas a lesser number is most likely controlled through socialization and their individual decision much later in life.

The deviation from the norm requires not to be encouraged to be on the safe side. Being a heterosexual is taken as normal, and it is an agenda not to be talked about or discussed. According to the Egans argument, it is due to the existence of an adoption of deviation that makes society start analyzing the cause of the abnormality. Egan does not see the need of much rise of the controversy but just follow the culture. We would not be pleased to see our children drowning in the same misunderstanding of deviation. From the Egan's discussion, it is evident from the early times, a lot of vigilance was necessary to children from their caretakers and even doctors. They could be made to realize themselves naturally after a very careful self-examination and self-realization (Egan, 2014: para.6). We dont want to assume that one accidentally finds himself or herself into a different world. That's why there is still need to know ourselves earlier in the ages before the vice hit most of our lives in such a discussion.

If sexuality were normal regardless whether heterosexuality or homosexuality, it would not be a matter of concern or an issue for debate. That is because there is something queer that has implanted itself in our societies that are already taking the roots. Bindels discussion also starts asking the same question about it, why does it matter how or why we are lesbian or gay' (Bindel: 2014, para.1). The issue, therefore, becomes more of the topic of concern day by day about the misunderstanding. Does it mean an increase of the abnormality at an alarming rate means a higher domination of the genetic make-up of the vice if biological and not social construct? The rise of excuses would never cease unless a clear take and defined path are put forward to differentiate the truth from emerging assumptions.

More often, our cultural norm always stands out clearly while deviation from it separates as day and night. An increase in homosexuality means there has been a huge drift of fulfillment of sexual desires no matter which way to take it. Bindel argument stands out clearly that, if there could be a genetic make-up evidence about the homosexuality act, then the issue would have left us with no doubt it is biological. The unproven argument about the cause of the queer adoption is also evidenced in even new publication nowadays about homosexuality, witnessing it as a choice but not natural (Egan, 2014: para.5). That is why confusing excuses will never cease from those who want to brush off the social stigmatization and cleanse themselves from what they embrace daily. There is usually no justification to be in a wrong thing, and there must be a universal rule acceptable or to be adhered to in the society.

Lastly, could it be that much education has taken part in the existence of the deviation? According to Zevallos explanation, we have reached a tertiary level in the teaching that we are most likely to be attracted to the same sex and have experience. The education can also take root and lead to curiosity, thereby leading into experimentation of such an act. Therefore, if gender construction can be built upon being attracted, curiosity, or even experimentation, then we cannot miss such actions in our society. We live and have to accommodate people with different opinions of sexuality as our culture has paved the way for this to take place. There is no doubt that we engage in sexual acts to have a feeling of what it takes especially with young people. Before committing ourselves to marriage, we go through so many experiences all in the name of experimenting and act out of our curiosity promoting both heterosexuality and homosexuality by all means.

All in all, sexual orientation has remained a confusion still with neither definite stand nor understanding. It seems day by day as the vice continue to spread, more so the emergence of excuses, hence, more misunderstanding. Within the society, there are typical deviants of the rules and normality who want to do things of their own and their stands. I feel that creation of the reasons as to why to do so in a convincing manner leads to the creation of more breakage of the normality day by day. Moreover, if it becomes outlawed, then, there exist no need to ask ourselves why the vice spread at an alarming rate. However, to curb such abnormality, there is a need to enlighten our children by mentors to know themselves early before the habit becomes a character much later in their lives. That can make the larger number to stick to the culture without having overwhelming number turning out to be ignorant to the behavior.

Works Cited

BIBLIOGRAPHY Bindel, Julie. "Is Sexuality Innate or Socially Constructed?" (2014). 19 March 2017. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/julie-bindel/sexuality-and-gender_b_5191901.html.

Egan, Jesi. "Abusing Foucault: How Conservatives and Liberals Misunderstand "Social Construct" Sexuality." (2014). 19 March 2017. http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/03/04/sexuality_as_social_construct_foucault_is_misunderstood_by_conservatives.html.

Foucault, Michael. "The Social Construction of Sexuality (Essay)." (2013). 19 March 2017. https://automaticwriting1.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/the-social-construction-of-sexuality-essay/.

Messner, Michael A. "Sports and the Problem of Masculinity." Power at Play (1992). 19 March 2017. http:/www,Li.suu.edu/Library/circulation/Gurung/soc2370sgBecome100%StraightFall10pdf.

Zevallos, Dr. Zuleyka. "Sociology of Sexuality." (n.d). 19 March 2017. https://othersociologist.com/sociology-of-sexuality/.