Essay on Global Economic Justice

The current global situation does not bring about the fundamentals of human equity and wellbeing. The greatest challenge some people continue to face is the grossly unjust, especially about consumption of resources that has enhanced the comfort of other individuals and advanced their plans while others continue to face problems in securing sufficient nutrition, shelter and basic goods required to maintain a healthy existence. The poor spent most of their time producing goods for subsistence wages that are commonly by rich who enjoy high living standards and opportunities for respect, power, achievement, and advancement. Injustice as a causal force leads to human destruction conflict and violence. Thus, demands of social justice are needed to provide equitable control of resources.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

This experience has influenced my view in some ways. The main problem with global justice is power arrangement, which severely affects or works against the disadvantaged and the poor. The power exercised by private organizations and governments has led to measurable implications on the freedom and life of people. Private organizations and governments are primarily interested in using power to take advantage of citizens. However, this lawless and arbitrary exercise of power against individuals is unjust. Second, these realities based on exploitation of superior power have major implications on justice by suppressing basic human freedom. The economic and political institutions need to develop ways that enable citizens to enjoy, the effective rule of law, freedom from exploitation, freedom from coercion and violence, freedom from hunger and poverty and equal access to education, nutrition, housing, healthcare, and education. These values steer the institutions in the direction of social justice. Thus, a global economic justice requires a society that is more just and allow citizens to realize their freedoms, capacities, and functioning of human life.

My mind has changed completely because I would prefer to live in a world that is freer and just that the world that is less free than just. Governments and organizations need to take into account the moral basis of preferring justice when designing their current and future strategies and plans. Governments and agencies should also have good practical reasons for looking into the actions and policies that may result in justice in the world. More equity makes societies stronger. However, an exploitative and unfair system is likely to breed lawless action and resistance. Without strong moral feelings and obligations, moral convictions become important in changing the social order. Also, people living in a stratified society should only accept hierarchies of authority that is not imposed on the people.

My previous view was reinforced because, if we want the world with a sustainable level of justice, the rule of law and reduced social conflict, the people must invest in justice. Creating a system that every individual can satisfy his/her basic needs and every person feels respected is important. Right and liberties should guide an idea of a global civil society for every individual. It is a society where power reduced the potential of domination and exploitation by powerful people or state. Citizens only feel secure whenever they can pursue their values and interests and confident that the government cannot go against their interests. Thus, a just global environment is essential in the future of humanity especially when it is grounded in a permanent commitment to human justice and dignity. For the sake of the generations to come, the global world needs to practical and enduring ways of ending poverty, establishing global justice and human rights to every person in the world. I suggest that to make progress, the world need to move past two dominant ways of thinking about the moral obligations and when the distributive justice applies to promote distributive justice. The first approach can focus on the global distribution of resources, irrespective of background social relations and organizations. This approach identifies positive humanity based duties and responsibilities to support and promote the execution of the socio-economic rights of people. The second approach can focus on the justice of coercively enforced institutional measures governing access to resources. The approach can focus on negative duties and responsibilities not to harm people by imposing resource systems that encourage preventable socioeconomic human rights deficits. A moral obligation help promotes new solutions to challenges of social structural justice.

The readings and discussions provided a depth and justification for the particular challenges and problems in the world is poverty particularly in developing countries such as Asia and Africa. Developing plans for alleviating poverty and exercising the democratic rights of people is important. Every person requires equal attention, and extreme inequalities that are inconsistent with equal rights are negative implications of the government and organizations on moral equality. Having a global civil society presumes the development of a cross-cultural society that is equal and just. A fair system of a corporation that is viewed as free and normal increases the quality of life. People in a well-ordered society respect one another and believe their fundamental interests are fairly met by the society. The global society has to be feasible for people to respect and recognize the worth and reality of human beings. Having the world that people share a sense of fairness and justice has the prospect of sustaining a peaceful, stable, and civil, social life. Therefore, justice needs an urgent commitment to end poverty globally. It requires a commitment to human rights and democracy. It includes adherence to values of human dignity and fairness and the importance of shaping institutions and governments with such values to develop a peaceful civil society. These values are important in planning for the future primarily in establishing the potential bonds of international civility. This level of positive institutions of law economic opportunity and democracy will be important in reinforcing mutual respect and the values of civility. Thus, a just global environment is essential in the future of humanity especially when it is grounded in a permanent commitment to human justice and dignity. For the sake of the future generations, the global world needs to practical and enduring ways of ending poverty, establishing global justice and human rights to every person in the world. The economic and political institutions need to develop ways that enable citizens to enjoy, the effective rule of law, freedom from exploitation, freedom from coercion and violence, freedom from hunger and poverty and equal access to education, nutrition, housing, healthcare, and education. These values steer the institutions in the direction of social justice. Thus, a global economic justice requires a society that is more just and allow citizens to realize their freedoms, capacities, and functioning of human life. A moral obligation help promotes new solutions to challenges of social structural justice.