Essay Sample on Minority Oppression

Introduction

Omelas city refers to any town in the current situation in our livelihood today. It shows oppression in the society by the fortunate ones. In the article of the "The ones who walk away from the Omelas" shows the majority rule expose their weakness to the less fortunate, i.e., the minority by putting their interests above at the expense of the opposition. The festive at the Omelas city shows how the majority subject the minor to worship them and also enjoying the taxpayers' resources just because even if they exercise their democratic process the majority act through them by religion, ethnicity, political, social and racial oppression.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

One can take advantage of the situation in the corrupt society to achieve what he or she intends to depend on the connection that exists between and the majority to secure the opportunity. According to Alexander Hamilton, he argues that majority elect a demagogue who rather than work for the benefit of all citizens, set out to either harm the minority or action for the majority. This shows how the poor are taken advantage of by the able in the society. One takes advantage of such a situation to exploit the little resources the nation is endowed with. The high rate of grabbing what belongs to the community by the majority is on the rise to the available resources.

The child abandoned in the disused room at the city shows how the majority neglects the minority. The reference to young people going home in tears when they see the child shows how the majority are taking over at of the poor. The people go out into the streets and walk down the street alone showing the sign of rejection by the people who rule them. The people walking out of the beautiful city of Omelas down to the dark village farms shows how the majority have taken advantage of the poor to enrich themselves to build essential structures where they stay as kings while are suffering in the dark village homestays. The faces of the small children are amiably stuck in the good grey beard of a couple of crumbs of rich pastry are entangled by a show of fear accompanied by neglect and malnutrition that expose the rot of the people. Hence in such a situation, one takes advantage only if the rich and the majority rule surrounds him.

The joy, few laws without monarchy and slavery, happiness and beauty of the city describe what the people dream of or move out of Omelas to find in another new place which to my fear does not exist. The people of Omelas accept the bitter truth of injustice after they realize that the justice of reality does not exist. The place they go into is a place even less imaginable to most of what the city of happiness in paradox. They cannot describe it at all, it is possible that it does not exist but know they are going. According to [Herbert Marcuse, Repressive Tolerance] he said tolerance is extended to policies that conditions and modes of behavior which should not be tolerated the fear and misery they cause to the minority.

Conclusion

Most of the people in such society grow up thinking that that is how they meant to stay. Hence this can be related to the developmental changes of growth that is why the children grow up depressed in the environment they brought up. Due to this to the majority grow up thinking that is how they should adjust to hereditary and slavery without being aware of the harm they cause. For societies to curb this actions, they should be against any form of oppression and too woke up to their dreams of not living in fear and being taken advantage of.

Works Cited

Loewald, Hans W. "On motivation and instinct theory." The Psychoanalytic study of the child 26.1 (1971): 91-128.

Rapaport, David. "On the psychoanalytic theory of motivation." Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 8. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1960.