Paper Example on Gender-Specific Rehabilitation

Introduction

Addiction is something that affects both male and females. It, therefore, implies that when we are talking of habit, we are not talking about one gender but rather all the genders. When it comes to treatment, the two genders do not receive the same treatment. Due to the inherent differences between the sexes, the experiences regarding substance abuse are different. When setting up a rehabilitation center, the criteria must be looked into. It is useful to consider both males and females when dealing with rehabilitation.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

In a "gender-specific rehabilitation" program what is useful to be included in the needs of each group. Regarding rehabilitation, both males and females have different needs (Gagnon et al., 2017). It should have a comfortable environment that is away from distractions because improvement needs peace.

These components are critical because they make the process of rehabilitation smooth and easy as it is geared towards the needs of the specific gender that is receiving the treatment.

It does not in any way make the program gender-specific because other than the manual that will be used for treatment there are usually other activities that the patients do to help in the process. Some of the events would work better if done by a specific gender and they might not work if done by the other. "Gender-specific" means that the environment of the rehabilitation is suited for a particular gender including the activities done in the treatment center.

When talking about gender-specific, we are not referring to dealing with women only but rather taking care of the two genders. As said earlier the activities in the treatment centers are usually important hence we cannot be talking about gender-specific by women alone. Men too have the specific programs that they need to be also introduced (Richie, 2018). It, therefore, means that gender-specific does not look at women alone. We have to consider all the genders because if a man is taken in a women's only center, then he might not be helped much. It is therefore not right to say that saying gender-specific means women only.

It is always possible for one diagnostic standard to be used by another culture. Although it might be difficult to adapt, it can work well when there is proper coordination. Although the rule has been created to suit a specific group, we can always readjust to make it fit in another (Shiraev and levy, 2016). When using it, we have to include some parts that are in one culture and use other in the other culture.

An example of a cross-cultural diagnosis may be psychiatric treatment. Different cultures treat this condition different, and that means when a patient visits a clinician does not share a culture with he may find it challenging to diagnose psychiatry. It may be due to the fact this condition is taken differently by different cultures. The problem with cross-cultural diagnosis is that we might not understand the basis of satisfied condition well if we do not know the culture. It may be true to the fact that when not following the other lifestyle well then we are bound to face difficulties. The problems come regarding understanding the socio-cultural milieu of the different culture. It might be problematic and may hinder proper diagnosis from the clinician at the moment. It translates to mean that in cross-cultural diagnosis it is always tough to deal with it when there is no specialized training.

References

Gagnon, I., Gauvin-Lepage, J., Friedman, D., Grilli, L., & Kocilowicz, H. (2017). Should our treatments be gender-specific? Effect of gender on recovery from persistent post-concussion symptoms in children and adolescents participating in an active rehabilitation intervention. Br J Sports Med, 51(11), A36-A36.

Richie, B. (2018). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. In Women Prisoners and Health Justice (pp. 23-44). CRC Press.

Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2016). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical