Paper Example on Impacts of Drilling in ANWR

Introduction

Primarily, ANWR was established purposely for the conservation of unique species of fish alongside the general wildlife conservation (Guber & Christopher 55). Notably, it was also created to help conserve the world life population, the habitats through a procedural adherence to the international treaties and obligations to help maintain the water quality to the residence in the entire Alaska society. Oil drilling in the arctic national wildlife refuge (ANWR) often poised specific devastating and cumulative effects to the entire environment. It is worth acknowledging the fact that, oil drilling in ANWR has been an ongoing political controversy in the whole United States since continued drilling process would create destruction to the whole of wildlife and the general land conservation process. Logically, the concept of drilling should be designed in isolated regions to avoid periodic pollution which render wildlife susceptible environmental as well as health complications. Significantly, the general concern of this paper is to focus on the logical, emotional as well as the ethical issues that arise due to oiling drilling in the ANWR. Based on statistical analysis, it is clearly revealed that there is extensive drilling occurring ANWR with an estimation of 16.0 barrels crude oil and natural gas generated(Guber & Christopher 55)

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

To begin with, drilling in ANWR in Alaska USA has several adverse effects ranging from environmental to the health complication among different species of organism in the entire region. Tentatively, this paper intends to oppose the drilling practice` whose long-term effects have seen the beautiful scenery in Alaska deteriorate following constant drilling in the area. It is worth acknowledging the fact that, constant oiling in ANWR poised detrimental factors which render the entire life into dire situations (Guber & Christopher 55). Such consideration includes:

Disruption of Wildlife Migration Routes and Habitats From Noise Pollution, Traffic and Fences

The biological systems of living organism require peaceful ecosystems to enhance the general colonization of their respective habitats (Balkenhol 4155). Shockingly, the drilling process has severe ecological consequences when interrupted by human activities. Logically, the increased vehicle traffic at the oil drilling sites creates noise pollution in the entire wild lands ecosystem. The short-term effect of the continued oil spillage and the general noise pollution is that the wild animals and birds which respond rapidly to the noise will have a change in their behaviour. On the other hand, the constant corruption generally has a negative impact such as disruption of the songbird communication during the breeding and nesting seasons altering the prey and predation dynamics. Based on this magnitude of disturbances, several species of plants and animals face habitual trafficking as well as death continually occurring on the roads. On the same account, by cutting the migration routes due to drilling activities, the lives of several mammals such as the antelopes are threatened affecting overall survival within the entire habitat (Balkenhol 4155).

Oil Spillage on the Water Bodies

Following the trending paradigms in the Trumps administration and the pro-drilling members of Congress wants to open up the wilderness in Alaska to massive oil and gas drilling regardless to the challenges accompanying the entire process ( Becerik et al. 155). Notably, this move would be disastrous since the refuge area` will be completely affected by the fragmentation as well as the industrial infrastructure. Tentatively, the everlasting destruction of the various habitats tends to expose the fragile tundra and wildlife to the toxic chemicals released from the oil spillage. The ultimate result is that the lubricants spilt around the good pads tens to expose the entire living organism into a general life constrain leading t migration or death of certain vulnerable organisms. More importantly, the unexpected cumulative effects of frequent small spills on land present long-term environmental influences and chronic health effects including the potential risk of disease. On the same account, the inhaled gas 'discharges further disturb the animals due to irresponsible activities such as the oils spillage and long-term ecological changes.

Gas Flares and Light Pollution Disrupt Scenic Views

Based on the in-depth research, it is clearly indicated that the gas flares a, along with the constant light pollution from the ANWR oil drilling poised practical cultural significance within the entire region. It is imperative to note that, the ongoing drilling of oil and gas production from the well sites poised massive destruction of the precious scenery values. Remarkably, along the major travel routes, the oil spillage destroys the unique, beautiful public lands which render the whole scene into complete devastating situations in the entire environment. On the same account, the burning of the flaring natural gas witnesses in entire regions as a result of the burning gases and its products generally has full adverse effects to the endangered species in the whole ecosystem. Similarly, the general drilling process would triggers once feeling since the dust generated from the drilling process has a negative impact on the beautiful scenery often witnessed on the entire region( Becerik et al. 155).

Effects of Dangerous Gas Emissions to Climate Change

Logically, some of the sole reason why the drilling process in the ANWR should be opposed is due to the fact that, emission of dangerous` gases into the atmosphere poised more inhabitable conditions to both the plants and animals species. It is worth acknowledging the fact that, the greenhouse emission which emanates from constant oil drilling process results into the global warming process. Notably, the entire society tends to suffer a lot due to the presence of leaks and faulty infrastructure in the natural gas production which immensely results in the emission of the natural gas into the wild ecosystem. Shockingly, even though the most wildlife and several animals are affected by the periodic oil spillage, the general public administration are out to enact laws allowing continued oil drilling in the entire site regardless of the dangers caused.

The general feeling created is that the result of oil drilling though has massive economic contribution should not be allowed to proceed due to its negative impacts on the environment. The overall ecosystem and the specific habitats occupied by various species are significantly affected by the constant oil drilling within the entire habitat. Based on this account, the relevant environmental conservation departments in the United States are therefore expected to roll out the public awareness of the dangers caused by the pollutants generated from the drilling process.

Ethical Concerns of Oil Drilling in ANWR

Following the in-depth research, it is worth acknowledging the fact that, ethically the concept of oil drilling in the ANWR threatens the lives of different species within the entire ecosystem (Teel et al. 450). Because, even though oil drilling is done in this ecosystem, it cannot produce enough oil for the whole of the population neither can it result into a drop in the general prices of fuel in the whole United States. However, the general environmental conservation department has lost the ethical standards as well as the moral requirements in conserving wildlife. Apparently, since ANWR wilderness was originally designed specifically to inhibit the wildlife along with the unique species of fauna and flora, ethically this should be conserved to the later (Teel et al. 450).

Observation and Critical Ideas Made on the Oil Drilling in ANWR

Following the keen analysis and the comment made on the entire concept of oil drilling in ANWR clearly shows a series of disparities on the whole process. Ideally, oil drilling has a negative impact on the environment, global warming alongside the massive extinction of both the fauna and flora species in the entire ecosystem.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in order to achieve the intended purpose of creating ANWR to conserve the rare species of fish and general wildlife the oil drilling within this region minimized.

Works Cited

Balkenhol, Niko, and Lisette P. Waits. "Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife." Molecular Ecology 18.20 (2009): 4151-4164.

Becerik-Gerber, Burcin, et al. "Civil engineering grand challenges: Opportunities for data sensing, information analysis, and knowledge discovery." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 28.4 (2013): 135-160.

Guber, Deborah Lynn, and Christopher J. Bosso. "Framing ANWR: Citizens, consumers, and the privileged position of the business." Business and environmental policy: Corporate interests in the American political system (2007): 35-60.

Teel, Tara L., et al. "Evidence of biased processing of natural resource-related information: a study of attitudes toward drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge." Society and Natural Resources 19.5 (2006): 447-463.