Paper on History Example: World War I

Question 1: Does the effect of pf WW1 have a lasting impact on human society? Yes or no?

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Yes! The Great War had a farfetched detrimental impact on the society of human race. In the vast era of worlds major military conflicts, about everything accounted to have happened. The most major books of history and millions of research studies elude that such happenings include the Bolshevik Revolution in Russian Confederation, World War I, the Holocaust and several others

Impacts of the War

Among the far-fetched impacts it had was the federal outlay. There was also the destruction of four monarchies during the Great War. They included Russia, Turkey, Austria-Hungary, and Germany. In Russia for instance, the Bolshevik rose to power in the year 1917. The war also led to the rise of fascism in Italy in 1922. The War also disrupted economic stability of European countries involved. The advent allowed the USA to become the only reliable creditor and its rise to ultimate superiority. Soon after the war, the German government took over the banks, any form of foreign trade and all forms of production of foods and armaments. With the Bolsheviks taking control in Russia, an advanced nationalization program got enacted followed by a well-planned economic structure. This economic structure also took form in other countries.

World War I resulted in the death of several individuals including more than 9million armed soldiers, sailors, civilians, and flyers. The whole activity is estimated to have cost a total of $186 billion with another significant sum used indirectly to facilitate the overall activity. Most resources available for study account that it was the first war ever in human history that incorporated the use of aircraft, long range artilleries, and missiles; with such advancements, several people were disabled.

The war also changed the nature of the warfare. Europe had not fought a major war like for 100 years, and there existed a hopeful society of peaceful cohesion and perfect relation. None the less, there was shattering of belief in human progress with the occurrence of World War I. During the very first weeks and a month into war; the armies used first communication techniques such as carrier pigeons. This natural form of communication yet mobilized million military troops but as the war was coming to an end, the airplane dropped bombs, machine guns and rifles transformed the nature of the warfare into a modern one. The result of such advanced technology was that: in only a day at the Battle of the Somme in the year 1916, 100,000 troops of armed soldiers killed each other with several missing, others severely wounded. The four years of war accounted the death of 1 million British soldiers, 1.5 million Hapsburg empire soldiers, 1.7million French military officials, and over 1.8 million German and Russian soldiers.

Question 2: How does one of the great powers seek power to make themselves more powerful? Explain what they did with specific examples. Did the countries actions make the world safer or more dangerous?

Seeking Power

The Great Britain managed to harness the support of other European countries during the Falklands war. The support was a primary requirement for economic sanctions against Argentina. Britain made use of mechanisms of coordinated forums within the European community. Since such institutions were brought up to facilitate and coordinate economic integration within Europe, no one thought that any of the member countries could require the use of such policy to assist in security systems against an outsider country.

Several theories illuminate how nations interacted during the periods of cold war. Liberal institutionalism came into existence after the end of the first world war when the president of the US founded the league of nations. His central concept was the promotion of perpetual peace. In the heart of a liberal internationalist, an ideology exists that different states can be made to cooperate and mingle with each other economic regardless of the system they are. By identifying the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as an example, we realize that its functional purpose did not transform the member states, but it has influenced preference and belief of countries at all governmental levels. The Anglo-French Entente also dynamically increased cooperation within the countries themselves and also between the member countries and Russia. Such influence was never thought ever to exist. In these institutions, those countries which played significant roles establishing themselves are eroded off power and given to the less voluble and newly enacted countries as a way of letting them have the legitimacy, the voice, and means of influence.

Politically neoliberalists assert that nations are never alike which would result in a difference in subjective preferences. In extent to the viability of this statement, international agreements with such countries can lead to alteration of power, change in belief and goals in a way likely to affect foreign relations of that particular country. Liberal institutionalism came into existence after the First World War when Woodrow Wilson, president of the United States by then came to power. Its main agenda, therefore, as said earlier, is to promote peace. Since the League of Nations failed to deliver their promise of peace, there was a reemergence between neoliberalists and liberal internationalists. Something that reduced chances of war and increased chances of perpetual peace. Liberals argued that democracy is the only way a nation can adopt peace and reduce chances of war. Additionally, it would also be contending that a leader from any democratic country was to derive their power from the people through public electoral systems. It is therefore in the interest of the public that the elected leaders refrain from formulating aggressive policies that could lead to conflict or even war. Liberalists also assert that the realization of a state of stability and relative peace in any international system that adopts democracy is very possible. However, realism separates itself from federal natural rules of politics. By the beliefs of Realists, it is the structural system that shapes the acts of units.

Question3: What effect of WW1 led to the collaps of Germany in the 1920s? and why is this so important?

Several issues were encompassing Germany in the 1920s that made it susceptible to falling. One major factor is the economic drawback. After the First World War, it was forced to pay the considerably large sum of money to France and Britain. At first, the ailment of war Germany faced made it start creating transportation projects and modernize power plants. All this was a way of alleviating bumping rates of increased unemployment. The ability of Germany to no longer be in a position of waging war made the Kaiser to sue for peace. This desperate state also led to the public demand for a more authoritative kind of leadership. Lots of cultural despair caused by several deaths led to the disillusionment with both national and international politics.

During the World War I, nationalistic sides were still operational. Germany was unified having beaten several countries in battle mostly, the European countries. When the German war monger, William Kaiser came to power, he had quite a unique view of war. He never had any political savvy as Bismarck did. Germany, therefore, had to fall because it had a leader who wanted to win battles yet lacked the technical know-how. He cleverly tried to gain power by attacking every country. Little did he know that this policy of attacking anyone could lead to the destruction of Germany. One of the major advantages of her fall is that advent of wars without course subsided plus; several peace treaties came to happen.

By attacking the Soviet Union, the German soldiers knew they were signing their death sentences because it was evident that they could not beat them even though they came so close. Through their leader Kaiser, they underestimated the potential of Russia. Secondly, the German defeat was caused by strategies of war. The morale of the soldiers goes flat while desertion levels increased. Communists also kept on carrying out demonstrations demanding an end to the war. All the same one of the major drawbacks of Germanys success was the starvation that had tolled in the country. The economy as stated earlier, was also under hunger stress with a recorded 55% of reduced production. The Germans then began digging for metals in their hunger striven country since there was no external supply of such products. Lack of industries and raw material required the leaders to be more careful with the methods of handling weapons and ammunitions. Citizens, therefore, got very anxious and opposed war by all means. One of the parties that accelerated the fight of ending the war was the communist party. All the same, the inclusion of United States into this war was further devastating for the already weakened country. The native citizens of Germany only kept the spirit of fighting even till their downfall because of the presence of nationalists who mobilized everyone to unite.

Reference

World War I History. (1970). Retrieved on December 9, 2016, from http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/world-war-i-history.

World War I | Facts & History | Britannica.com. (1970). Retrieved on December 9, 2016, from https://www.britannica.com/event/World-War-I.

World War I | HistoryNet. (1970). Retrieved on December 9, 2016, from http://www.historynet.com/world-war-i.

WSJ.com News Graphics. (1970). World War I Centenary: Legacies of the Great War. Retrieved on December 9, 2016, from http://online.wsj.com/ww1/.

A Guide to World War I (Virtual Programs & Services .... (1970). Retrieved on December 9, 2016, from https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/wwi/wwi.html.