The Quick Response Management - Paper Example

Why was the QR approach significant in improving the companys supply chain performance?

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The quick response management, QR was significant in improving the supply chain of the company in that it led to appropriate supply of goods, cost control and customer satisfaction for Jossey Menswear. Through the QR system, the supply chain became significant in that the appropriate supply of goods were made (Fernie, & Azuma, 2014). After its introduction, the organization realized the necessity of supplying only those clothes that were in fashion and those that would be should in time enough for the organization to be competitive. The unnecessary purchase that would fill the store without realizing sales was reduced by the QR system (Fernie, & Azuma, 2014). The system ensured that all clothes; coats for instance supplied had higher chances of being sold in time enough such that they would not fill the store and become a burden for the organization.

The QR system was also significant as it helped the organization in controlling its costs. Before the system was implemented, the organization would make unnecessary purchase of clothes that would take long before purchase or might not be bought at all (Christopher, 2013). With the clothes not purchased in the store, a lot of cost was held within the store yet the organization needed such funds in making more profits. The introduction of the QR system is important in ensuring that only goods that would be sold were purchased such that the available costs were maximized within the organization (Christopher, 2013). The costs that would be used in purchasing goods that would otherwise be filling the store have been maximized by making buying goods that would be sold within the stipulated time.

The QR system has also helped in satisfying the Jossey Menswear customers in many ways. For instance, all the required clothes are availed in time for the customers, (Lee, Padmanabhan, & Whang, 2017). The system also ensures that the clothes availed are in fashion and suits the current customer needs. The availability of the entire customer requirements at all times is another factor about the organization that has been influenced by the QR systems use in supply chain for the organization. The use of the QR system in supply for Jossey Menswear has boosted the sales of the organization and has led to the control of the organizations operations and most importantly providing the needs of customers all the time (Lee, Padmanabhan, & Whang, 2017).

Do you think the Cornwall plants approaches to introducing QR ideas were appropriate?

Cornwall Plant also wanted to implement the QR system within its operations. The plant intended to use various strategies while employing the strategy into its supply chain. One of the strategies intended for use was to remove all the barriers that would bar the system from being implemented and its effectiveness as well (Lowson, King, & Hunter, 2015). Since the QR system is a new system for the organization, it was appropriate to eliminate all barriers such that the organization would operate smoothly. The elimination of a rigid payment system for instance was necessary for the system to find a free operating system where it could work freely without any restrictions (Christopher, & Towill, 2013). The factory limited system was another issue that needed to be eliminated with the introduction of the new system. Eliminating the barriers was a better way through which the organization would improve its success with the new system of supplying (Lummus, & Vokurka, 2016). The supply chain system introduction through the elimination of boundaries is important as it allows for the system to operate freely without obstacles.

The other intended change for the organization in the implementation of the QR system at Cornwall was the shift of the working system from individualism to collaborative working technique. The intended shift from individualism was intended to ensure that the organization operated on a collaborative system of work (Lowson, King, & Hunter, 2015). The shift was important for the organization in that it allowed uniformity and collaboration in operation and system uniformity for the organization hence its ultimate success. The change to collaborative work by the organization was to ensure that all organizational activities fell in the right place at the same time (Christopher, & Towill, 2013). For the new system of supply, QR to be effective, it was necessary for the organization to focus on a particular goal instead of certain sectors of the same organization operating individually (Lummus, & Vokurka, 2016). The collaborative operation was important for the organization to maximize its operations throughout the production system with the introduction of the new supply techniques.

Which of the possible future actions identified by the supply chain team do you think are worth pursuing and why?

Of the possible future actions identified by the supply chain team management, forming the teams and the payment system barriers are some of the useful actions that are worth pursuing (Lambert, & Cooper, 2014). Forming the teams as proposed by the organization would incorporate the trouser and jacket assembly groups. The groups would be effective for the organization since they would concentrate on their various areas of specification (Mentzer, Min, & Zacharia, 2012). Each group would ensure that its sector is maximized as much as possible such that it results into better products that are competitive and of the highest quality. Separating the jacket assembly from the trouser assembly would require that every group maximizes its products to the highest standards possible. The combination of the jackets and the trousers should make a perfect match for the organization. The formation of the various groups is necessary for the organization as it ensures that all sectors are managed separately but in a perfect manner that results into proper results for the organization (Fawcett, Magnan, & McCarter, 2011).

The other proposal put across by the organization involves the payment system barriers. There has been a payment system barrier that has prevented the organization from managing its funds effectively (Mentzer, Min, & Zacharia, 2012). The revision of the payment barriers and the creation of new modes of payment would ensure that the organizations funds are managed properly. The supply chain management team have considered the revision of the payment system barriers an important aspect of the organization because there have been cases of fund mismanagement within the organization (Fawcett, Magnan, & McCarter, 2011). The control over the payment systems for the organization would ensure that the organization manages its funds appropriately to maximize its profits and maintain a perfect supply chain within its system (Lambert, & Cooper, 2014). The implementation of the two proposals discussed above as proposed by the supply chain management team if implemented would ensure that the organization operates at its best. The amount of profits made by the organization in such a case would increase drastically.

References

Christopher, M. (2013). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 37-44.

Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2013). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235-246.

Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2011). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 35-48.

Fernie, J., & Azuma, N. (2014). The changing nature of Japanese fashion: Can quick response improve supply chain efficiency?. European journal of marketing, 38(7), 790-808.

Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2014). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 65-83.

Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (2017). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management science, 43(4), 546-558.

Lowson, B., King, R., & Hunter, A. (2015). Quick Response: Managing the supply chain to meet consumer demand. Wiley.

Lummus, R. R., & Vokurka, R. J. (2016). Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(1), 11-17.

Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2012). The nature of interfirm partnering in supply chain management. Journal of Retailing, 76(4), 549-568.