The Realistic Conflict Theory - Essay Sample

Introduction

The realistic conflict theory expresses that at any point there are like two groups that are seeking for natural constrained assets; this will lead to conflict, convictions and negative generalizations, and separation by the groups. The dispute can lead to expanding animosity directed to the groups and can make a continuous fight eruption.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Then again, conflict, negative convictions and generalizations, and separation between groups can conceivably be diminished in occurrences where at least two groups are looking to get some superordinate achievements. Superordinate achievements are commonly enticing objectives achievable without the investment of at least the two groups. On account of its accentuation on the class practices and strife, the sensible clash hypothesis is likewise implied to as the reasonable gathering struggle hypothesis.

Critical Evaluation

One of the first instances of realistic conflict theory is that of Robber's Cave study in the 1950s that was led by social psychologist Muzafer Sherif back. Sherif coordinated a field test in Oklahoma at Robber's Cave State Park utilizing twenty-two young guys. Every one of the twenty-two teenagers was at the age of 12 years, came from a two-parent upbringing, and was from a white middle-class foundation, it was also made sure that none of the individuals knew the other before the examination. Sherif split the members into two different groups which are the Rattlers and Eagles.

None of the groups knew that the other's existence among the first phase of the investigation. At the point of the early stage, the members were associated with a few practices with their group participants, like the example of, swimming and hiking. These competitions enabled individuals to form links with their group and come up with their group expectations, norms, and culture.

When the individuals had turned out to be merged to their very own groups, Sherif familiarized the groups with one another and masterminded challenging games and different conflicts amidst the groups. Like in the case that one of the games that were competitive expected the Rattlers and the Eagles to challenge one another in a set of baseball. The victor's group got a reward and individual medals for the group individuals, on the other hand, the loser had nothing to acquire.

Sherif began to see that the classes were calling each other names and poking each other. Be that as it may, as the competitive games proceeded, the groups began and grew to be hostile. For instance, the Rattlers' banner was set ablaze by the Eagles while Rattlers wrecked the Eagles' sleeping area. In the end, the groups transpired to be so reluctant with each, and they had to be physically separated. Keep in mind that these groups had 22 composed guys. The individuals were never crooks before, nor did they show a background marked by aggressive or dangerous activities. In any case, when rivalry and struggle were revealed, their practices ended up oppressive and hostile.

Robbers Cave research has been censored on various reasons. For instance, the two teams of youthful men in the examination were artificial, similar to the challenge, and neither did it reflect reality. For example, a middle-class youth arbitrarily doled out into two different teams isn't match internal city packs, or adversary football fans.

Right-minded issues should also be taken into consideration. The teammates were corned, as they didn't understand the genuine reason for the examination. Likewise, participants were not protected from mental and physical destruction. Nor should the results be added up to reality because the evaluation used only twelve-year-old white middle-class teenagers and avoided, for instance, young ladies and adults. The example was one-sided.