Article Analysis Essay on Endurance and Sprint Benefits

Introduction

In the article, the research questions are; What is the level of comparison of the changes in the performance parameters following six weeks of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) of 1:1 Work recovery ratio, Supramaximal Interval training (SMIT) with 1:5 Work recovery ratio, and continuous running training. The differences from training in different types of training are being assessed. It is aimed at getting the training method which is spearheaded towards the better training of athletes in separate dockets such as short distance time trial performances and even cycling.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

In the run towards answering the above question, the study was designed specifically. The study design involved the randomization of a controlled trial. The participants matched for an organized 3000 m timed trial performance. There was the performance of pre-testing in three weeks. In the first week, 3000 m trial test was conducted. In the second week, 40 sprint test, as well as the RSA test, was performed. Finally, in the third week, reliability trial tests for the 40 m sprint test as conducted. The participants undertook different training programs between weeks 4 to 9. Between weeks 9 to 12, post-testing was performed. During this period, the participants completed 40 m sprint test, 3000 m trial, as well as reliability trial test. The requirement was that the participants were needed to provide a written informed consent for participation in the study.

The participants of the study were randomly allocated into the three study groups; the HIT intervention, the SMIT intervention, and the control intervention. They were 23 in number in the three groups. They were the moderately and recreationally trained individuals in different sports such as soccer, netball, and basketball. For the 3000 m participants, they were required to familiarize with the training asphalt course before the time trial where they were advised to run to their maximum as the study was being conducted. The 40 m sprint and RSA test was done in an indoor basketball pitch. During the trial, the participants stood at 30 cm behind them=gate mark and were directed to sprint to their maximum.

Concerning the significant findings of the study, they were analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0 for the windows. Following the study on the changes in the body mass of the participants, there were no significant changes in body masses in the pre and post-training interventions for the HIT, SMIT, and the control groups. For all tests, control groups showed no notable differences between the pre and the post-intervention running periods for all the tests conducted. Observed was a notable reduction in the 3000 m. There were also marginal changes in the 40 m sprint in both the male and female participants of HIT groups. Finally, there were notable improvements in 40 m sprints.

Moreover, for the 3000 m, the changes in scores were related to the changes in score. The female groups had a more significant change in score than the male groups. The changes in scores for SMIT were larger compared to the changes in scores for a HIT. Also for the 40 m sprint, it came out that the changes in scores were marginally related to baseline scores. The change in scores for SMIT group was more significant than that of HIT group. Finally, for the RSA test, the baseline scores were like the changes in scores. There was also no gender group interaction.

Conclusion

For the significant applications to training to take from the study, SMIIT should be used to improve sprint as well as repeated sprint performance for the physically active individuals. Moreover, HIT should be sued in training for the males in 3000 m time with 1:1 WR. It is because the 10-week test proved 3000 m males to have elicited improvements with the 1:1 WR. Generally, SMIT should be a better choice in selecting a training module because of its improved performance for the participants in the tests. 40 m sprint programs should also be executed using SMIT programs since they prove most effective.