Essay Sample on Bio Ethics: Moral Permissibility of Abortion

Introduction

Many people have had varying views and opinions on the topic of the moral permissibility of abortion. Their views have brought forth arguments and examples that sway readers to defend the morality of abortions or oppose its moral permissibility. However, it might be difficult to establish the correct arguments regarding this topic. In this paper, I will review two opposing viewpoints on the morality of abortion.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

John Harris, who is one of the authors, in this case, presents views that compel people to interrogate assumptions regarding whatever makes life valuable, as well as what leads to humanity. Kirsten Moore recommends new ways of presenting the case for choice. These ways involve emphasizing with the decision of women to make abortions. Based on Ann Furedi's view, she suggests that pro-choice advocates are always defensive about the morality of abortion. As such, these advocates argue that abortion providers are doing a moral job (Milne, 2018). In essence, due to the support that abortion gets in the UK both from the public and the political field, it shows that the work of abortion providers is widely accepted hence ought not to be assumed by the pro-choice movement.

Ideally, life is a valuable asset that should be enhanced and not interfered with in any way. For instance, when a hospital has a slow-burning fire, the management will need to work out ways of prioritizing the contents to be rescued. Since the hospital contains patients, pregnant women, healthcare professionals, embryos, viruses, it would be essential to consider rescuing the patients before viruses or embryos. This is a moral perspective that is unavoidable and does not only come about in relation to abortion (O'Brien, 2008). The indication that different nations like the United Kingdom have wrong policies on the issue of abortion is not evident as people conceive the policies across a broad spectrum. In essence, as the abortions are permitted over the gestational age, it accords with moral considerations.

For morality of abortion to be promoted, there might be the need to engage a political strategy that will bring new options to men and women hence preventing unwanted pregnancies, terminating unwanted pregnancies, as well as prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. When these are ensured, people will uphold moral principles in society. Abortions should not make people judge the women, but preferably there is the need to show some sense of empathy (Milne, 2018). Conversely, technology has changed the way in which people relate to and interact with each other hence making new generations to have a different concept of privacy. Birth control methods are widely used as they are safer and efficient.

The decision between a woman and the doctor on the reason for ending a pregnancy should always be considered of crucial concern. When the mother decides for the fetus and the need to terminate a pregnancy, the moral principle of autonomy would be evident. The abortions may be of great benefit to the mothers who may have complications when giving birth (O'Brien, 2008). However, at circumstances, the decisions of a woman on abortion may be influenced by pressure from their partners, parents for the minors, as well as social rejection. The issues of economic inequalities and unequal access to health care may influence the decisions of women who want to terminate the pregnancy.

Importantly, when people talk about the morality and ethics of abortion, they think about how moral it would be to carry out pregnancy termination on an 11-year old girl. In this case, ethical action will need to be pulled together between the nurses and doctors involved in the child's care. As such, morals, law, ethics and service delivery should work together to avoid the adverse outcomes of abortions that would be felt. Two doctors do not have to prove grounds for abortions (Caplan & Arp, 2014). Since abortions take place for unwanted pregnancies, people should be honest about it and incorporate the relevant law, which reflects the practice. All the abortion procedures ought to be regulated based on clinical necessity and not the backward attitudes of some people. For long periods, the women in pro-choice movement felt that the public opinion regarding abortion was not in their favor. In contrast, the anti-choice movement got the public support on the abortion issue. Even though the public may not like abortion idea and do not want to talk about it, they know it needs to be provided to help deal with unwanted pregnancies.

Conclusion

Women, healthcare professionals, and the public should uphold the relevant moral principles like autonomy and justice for those who want to terminate pregnancies. The principles will promote respect for human life, as well as safeguarding the fundamental rights. The values contained in interpersonal relationships may make the woman facing unwanted pregnancy to lead a fulfilled life. The relationships would also guarantee the rights of vulnerable women without neglecting the obligations of an individual. The laws enforced to legalize abortion should be in accordance with morals and bioethics.

References

Caplan, A. & Arp, R. eds. (2014). Contemporary debates in bioethics. Wiley-Blackwell.

Milne, E. (2018). The Moral Case for Abortion, written by Ann Furedi. European Journal of Health Law, 25(2), 223-227.

O'Brien, J. (2008). Presenting the case for conscience. BPAS (British Pregnancy Advisory Service), Abortion, Ethics, Conscience and Choice. https://drive.google.com/a/tesc.edu/file/d/0B5XBUX1iDcmDUWs2OGkxU3R5Q1k/view?usp=sharing