Paper Example on France and England Politics in 1600s to 1800s

Introduction

The global political environment has significantly transformed over the years with a critical focus on essential elements that define public involvement democratically. Therefore, to adequately understand the current political situation, there is a need to integrate critical measures which define a successful emphasis on better elements that have shaped global politics. The politics in the ancient times as specified by very different parameters which have created a better understanding of essential details that define positive change (Bayly, 18). Politics in the 1600s and 1700s did not focus on promoting essential aspects where the need for members of the public would be engaged. During this time there was a political turmoil across the globe. In Europe, there were significant changes orchestrated by protestant reformation which challenged the religious and political power which was dominated by the Catholic church leading to thirty years of war in the early 1600s. This paper provides a comparative analysis of the politics of France and the politics of England with a critical focus on the challenges that were encountered by the countries.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Politics is based on a strong ideology which is developed and focus on creating a profoundly transformed understanding between the relationship and level of engagement between individuals who are involved in a specific setting. The underlying environment plays a vital role in determining essential elements that can help in making better decisions that can have a positive influence on essential considerations that define successful commitment to underlying political values. Therefore, different countries have different political ideologies which play a key role in define positive change. The political environment in the 1600s through to 1800s was very difficult to understand especially taking into consideration better measures that define positive development (Bohstedt,19).

The early 1600s was defined by major revolution caused by the Protestant Reformation. This period was known as enlightenment period based on strong measures and commitment to the implementation of better elements that define positive change. The enlighten period sought to create better concepts which represent the relationship among individuals across different settings. This period witnessed the development of intellectual movements which focused on promoting democracy, freedom and rational inquiry. Enlightenment thinkers were critical of the civil authorities where they focused on developing new ideas defining the relationships between government and its people. The free-thinking that was inspired by a sustained period of enlightening created room for political revolutions in the 1700s which were aimed to overthrow monarchial rule (Bayly, 26).

Politics in England

During the 1600s through to 1800s, England was faced with similar problems as experienced by other countries in Europe, Politics, economy and social tension which was made worse by the significant religious differences. England had a parliament which was aimed at creating a highly effective interaction and wellbeing within the social environment. However, despite accomplishing these tasks, the parliament was at the center of the political division with the country. The parliament lacked direction making it difficult to have significant control over legislation which are important concepts which defined political development within the country.

Even competent leaders were unable to integrate key measures which defined the social interaction fully. Politics is based on social and economic concepts that are defined within a given context. Therefore, a lack of focus on improving the country economy and social interaction among individuals from different religious background were detrimental to the positive formation of important elements which shape the country political landscape.

England has very difficult leaders during this time. Oliver Cromwell made significant steps in creating a highly transformed political engagement through some of the critical decisions that he made which made it very difficult to have a better country that is well managed. Cromwell was referred to as the Lord protector by the parliament because it was his duty to protect the interests of England. However he received opposition from the parliament especially his spending towards the military. Under Cromwell's leadership, the house of lords was abolished, and the house of Commons was made subordinate to him. These decisions were made by Cromwell who sought to instill a totalitarian regime on the citizens of England. However, the restoration of the years 1660 was able to restore the country to its former state after the death of Cromwell. The monarchy and the house of lords were restored while the house of commons was restored to its independent state (Armitage, 31).

The politics of England around 1700s revolved around the formation of the union. The Treaty of Union and acts of union were passed by both parliaments which paved way from the formation of the Kingdom of Great Britain and a common parliament, the procedures, standing orders and traditions of England were retained as well as the officers that were in office. The focus on the monarch has a significant influence on the business of parliament which defined the political situation within the country. The ability to control the political challenges during this time focused on integrating better elements that define positive change within society. The realization that social, political and economic environment determine important aspects that define positive development.

The Politics of France

A monarch Louis XIII headed the political setting in France during the 1600s. The absolute king emerged in the 16th century although it was firmly established during the 17th century. The absolute monarchy was based on the fact that the monarchy controlled all the sectors of the government. The significant divisions between the upper class and middle class created very harsh political environment due to these differences. Either group was capable of leading a civil war. The middle class was largely unhappy because they were oppressed by the rich and had no power or influence (Armitage, 33).

The religious divisions also created major challenges which created major differences in measures that define poor political engagement. Political stability is based on better social interaction among individuals. Therefore, the divisions that were caused by religion were detrimental to the formation of any positive elements which defined the development of better developmental concepts. Religious extremism as rampant in France creating a complex situation where it was difficult to make any positive political decisions (Melehy, 34).

The monarchy system in the country created very difficult emphasis on political environment considering that there was no focus on building a diverse political system within the state. Most of the leaders sought to maintain influence and power without the emphasis on improving the wellbeing of the French citizens. Changing the perception and overall wellbeing within the society was instrumental in creating a better political environment where it was possible to integrate better concepts which define political changes within the societies.

The government plays an integral role in defining important elements that define better decisions that have been put in place. Politics concepts that are defined in this case are based on the need to consolidate political power within the country. The absolute monarchy system limited the development of individuals within the country especially those who hold different political ideology. These elements are critical in developing a highly transformed understanding of key concepts that help define positive social development. Although the development of absolute monarchy in France was aimed at limiting the significant religious differences which were detrimental to social progress. The long-term effects of absolute monarchy curtailed the development of key concepts based centralized government where the monarchy had absolute power and control over key departments (Turner,17).

Politics Comparison

France and England were developed based on an almost similar political approach which created a highly a highly successful understanding of important elements that define high commitment to politics. Both the France and England politics are based on a certain plan which helps identify important factors that define positive association on key concepts that define positive development within the respective countries. The common challenges during the 1600s involved the development of the middle class which had a higher influence on political organization with the countries. The middle class was largely ignored and did not have any influence and were subjected to limited resources by the elite political level.

Religious divisions also created a very difficult environment where it was difficult to embrace political development in both France and England. Religious divisions were a significant issue across Europe and thus created a very difficult situation where no better measures were developed. Individuals were divided between the two religious factions which became a center of focus rather than the need to improve focus on politics.

Therefore, even though both France and England had complex politics, England had a more organized political environment through its parliament which had independent responsibilities also though many leaders sought to influence parliament and its inability to make better political decisions. The England system as more successful which explains why the current political organization in England has remained the same with few changes over the years. The house commons and the house of lords which play a major role in England's politics. Politics outline major elements which define social engagement which is important in identifying better elements that define positive development across different societies. England has an environment is easily influenced by important factors that determine positive change within society.

Conclusion

Politics in the 1600s through 1800s define a very complex level of engagement especially considering to major challenges which limited the ability to integrate better political ideologies that help define a given region and the underlying key concept that define positive development among individuals. Politics plays an important role in interacting with individuals who have varying opinions regarding who they are engaged politically. The development of different classes within society has been essential in defining success.

Works Cited

Armitage, David. Theories of Empire, 1450-1800. Routledge, 2016.

Bayly, Christopher Alan. Imperial Meridian: The British Empire and the World 1780-1830. Routledge, 2016.

Bohstedt, John. The politics of provisions: food riots, moral economy, and market transition in England, c. 1550-1850. Routledge, 2016.

Kelly, James E. The English convents in exile, 1600-1800: communities, culture, and identity. Routledge, 2017.

Melehy, Hassan. The poetics of literary transfer in early modern France and England. Routledge, 2016.

Rahe, Paul A. Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume II: New Modes and Orders in Early Modern Political Thought. UNC Press Books, 2017.

Turner, Katherine. British Travel Writers in Europe 1750-1800: Authorship, Gender, and National Identity: Authorship, Gender, and National Identity. Routledge, 2017.