Introduction
In this paper, the conflict is defined as some forms of disagreement and friction arousing between people and individual in a group when suggestion belief or opinion of a member of the group is resisted or unacceptable by others people or party involved. Conflicts involve opposing the idea of different entities this resulting in disagreement and antagonistic form of state.
According to the author, there are different forms of conflicts involved in any form of group. It can comprise of; Interpersonal conflicts which are usually a conflict between two individuals. The intrapersonal conflict which is a self-conflict (Jiang, 2016). intragroup conflict referred to be conflict occurring among individuals of the same group. Intergroup conflict being the misunderstanding of different teams within an organization. The cause of this kind of conflict can be due to the rivalry of resource or boundaries set by the different groups.
Vayrynen (2013) proposed the division of conflict into three categories which include process, tasks involved and the relationship between the conflicts. The author tries to differentiate between conflicting affective and cognitive conflicts. He explained cognitive conflicts to be task-oriented and comes from disparities in perspective and judgmental perspective whereas affective conflict is an emotional derivative and arose personal elemental of difference and disputes in people.
In the research paper describe sciences and art as per diagnostic conflicts. It is supported by an argument that we get involved into conflicts in our day to day activities, therefore it is evident that diagnostics conflict is not only science as said but also an art. a common practice we undertake is that we understand the causes of conflict hence its resolution (Anger, 2014). The authors suggested that the aim of every conflict resolution is finding out the cause of conflict and give a resolution to the problem it creates.
Finally, the author found that there are different approaches which can be employed during any type of conflict. The strength of this paper gives the solution to the mechanism used to solve the unavoidable conflict in a group. The author identifies the use of feedback is an essential process in the improvement of communication. As the author states that received information without feedback can be considered as information not delivered. According to the author, feed gives clarity to an individual information hence avoiding conflict may arise. The author summaries that any communication in an organization must always cover both the informal and the formal part of a conversation. In this aspect, he argues that if the manager pays close attention to the paramount's aspect in a conversation the would be in close contact with all his subordinates (Whitaker, 2016). For a conflict in a group to be resolved the author clearly states that there he should be a clear and a conscious communication. He argues that the use of a simple appropriate language which doesn't contain too much detail is specialized to give precise information that doesn't bring unexpected conflict due to interpretation. the author also argues that the deliverance of the information should be based on facts.
Conclusion
The limitation of his article is the article doesn't clarify that conflict can be disastrous and it does not show how a group identifies the cause of conflict (Healey, 2018). The article is not showing all the cause of conflict and how to resolve a conflict according to the other members perspective. The article does not involve any experiment impact conflict resolving.
Reference
Callaghan, T., & Jacobs, L. R. (2016). Interest group conflict over medicaid expansion: the surprising impact of public advocates. American journal of public health, 106(2), 308-313.
Choi, J. P., Chowdhury, S. M., & Kim, J. (2016). Group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118(4), 816-840.
Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y., & Ramalingam, A. (2016). Identity and group conflict. European Economic Review, 90, 107-121.
Codding, B. F., Parker, A. K., & Jones, T. L. (2017). Territorial behavior among Western North American foragers: Allee effects, within group cooperation, and between group conflict. Quaternary International.
Gavrilets, S., & Fortunato, L. (2014). A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nature communications, 5, 3526.
Healey, J. F., Stepnick, A., & O'Brien, E. (2018). Race, ethnicity, gender, and class: The sociology of group conflict and change. Sage Publications.
Jiang, X., Flores, H. R., Leelawong, R., & Manz, C. C. (2016). The effect of team empowerment on team performance: A cross-cultural perspective on the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and intra-group conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(1), 62-87.
Lieberman, E. S., & Singh, P. (2017). Census enumeration and group conflict: A global analysis of the consequences of counting. World Politics, 69(1), 1-53.Mifune, N., Hizen, Y., Kamijo, Y., & Okano, Y. (2016). Preemptive striking in individual and group conflict. PloS one, 11(5), e0154859.
Newcomb, T. M., Turner, R. H., & Converse, P. E. (2015). Social psychology: The study of human interaction. Psychology Press.
Saeri, A. K., Iyer, A., & Louis, W. R. (2015). RightWing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Outsiders' Responses to an External Group Conflict: Implications for Identification, Anger, and Collective Action. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 303-332.
Sherif, M. (2015). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. Psychology Press.
Silva, A. S., & Mace, R. (2015). Inter-group conflict and cooperation: Field experiments before, during and after sectarian riots in Northern Ireland. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1790.
Vayrynen, C. K. W., Aaldering, H., & Saygi, O. (2013). Conflict and negotiation within and between groups.
Whitaker, R. M., Turner, L., Colombo, G., Verma, D., Felmlee, D., & Pearson, G. (2017, July). Intra-group tension under inter-group conflict: a generative model using group social norms and identity. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 167-179). Springer, Cham.
Cite this page
Paper Example on Group Conflict. (2022, Sep 28). Retrieved from https://midtermguru.com/essays/paper-example-on-group-conflict
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the midtermguru.com website, please click below to request its removal:
- The Clinical Problem of Patient Care Safety and Associated Change - Paper Example
- N05 LEAU as a Product of the Chanel Company Analysis - Paper Example
- Corporate Responsibility Standards - Essay Sample
- Changes in Strategy and Strategic Direction Over the Last Ten Years of Thai Union
- Employment Training: Motivation & Quality Service - Research Paper
- The Developmental Levels of Leadership - Essay Sample
- Strategic Development for Corp. ABC: Enabling Vision & Actions for Value & Opportunities - Essay Sample