US and Iraq: A Conflict of Lack of Trust - Essay Sample

Introduction

Over the years in the attempts to establish a dialogue between the United States and Iraq, one must wonder why these two republics have remained hostile. The main reason as to why Iraq cannot be at peace with the United States lies in the issue of ambiguity and dependency. On the other hand, for the United States, it is a matter of not surrendering the dominant position and backing down. Hence, in both scenarios, lack of trust stands out as the central theme of conflict.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

After the invasion of Iraq by the US in 2003 and the overthrowing of the government of Sadam Hussein, the Iraq war was triggered. This war continued for over ten years, as various rebellions emerged to fight the post-invasion of the Iraq government.

Furthermore, the internal mechanisms of the government of Iraq were that the domestic political wrangling was more superior to foreign policy. This saw the breakdown of Iraq's foreign policy. The United States saw this as a possible threat as they did not know who was calling the shots. This made it difficult for America to involve Iraq with effective diplomacy. The most nonintoxicating case concerning the U.S. intrusion of Iraq, in 2003, which depended on the awful insight that Baghdad had dynamic weapons-of-mass-destruction programs. The repercussions are as yet playing out sixteen years later. The start of the Vietnam War was approved by two presently questioned episodes including U.S. warships in the Gulf of Tonkin. Accordingly, the Congress approved President Johnson, in 1964, to "take every single essential measure to repulse any furnished assault against the powers of the United States and to avert further hostility." The war delayed for 10 years, killing fifty-seven thousand Americans and upwards of a million Vietnamese contenders and regular citizens.

Also, the disagreement between the United States and Iraq over its nuclear program has caused tension between the two republics. Iraq has framed the nuclear issue as a national issue; by this, they have linked nuclear program to national sovereignty. It is close to impossible that Iraq will accept to surrender her atomic program. Thus the United States remained with two options. First, is to increase pressure on Iraq, or offer mechanisms for sanctions removal in case Iraq accepts to comply.

A major compelling point n all the feuds between the US and ran is the financial assents that the US has set on Iran. Beginning under the Carter organization, the US has consistently expanded its assents routine set up. These authorizations preclude the exchange of much-required military and oil innovation just as disallowing US organizations and people from putting resources into or working with Iranian nationals and organizations. Right now, Iran's atomic program may be the single most prominent hindrance to the resumption of US-Iranian relations. As indicated by the US, Iran has been building up a secret atomic weapons program under the pretense of a push to obtain nuclear vitality. Iran battles that their program is quiet.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Cultural diplomacy is the only best solution to reestablish relations amongst these two countries, instead of the use of force. It is essential to understand that Cultural diplomacy is grounded on the theme of understanding, dialogue, and trust. Some of these elements lack in Iraq-Us relations, and that is why there are constant disagreements between the two countries.

Reference

The Iraq War of 2003 https://www.britannica.com/event/Iraq-War

Case Study: Iraq and the United States http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/pdf/case-studies/cs-martinmilinski.pdf