Connie Mack & John McGraw: Defining Baseball's Needs - Essay Sample

Introduction

Sporting managers such as in baseball imperatively shape the spirit and notions of the players and team associates toward the game. Connie Mack and John McGraw are some of the baseball managers that have portrayed two very different exemplary messages for the team fraternities. Their personalities play a role in defining the way the Phillies and the New York Giants perceived and approached baseball and its needs. Their personalities are easily describable from the way they dealt with a wide range of issues and approaches to problem-solving in the sporting arena. Notably, their personalities help in discerning how differently they advocated for the baseball game.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Personalities of John McGraw and Connie Mack

The similarity between Connie Mack and John McGraw is the entitlement to the baseball team management for a significant period. They both acted in leadership positions in the New York Giants and Phillies. Notably, Connie doubled up as a legendary team owner in Philadelphia (Heaphy, 2014, p. 157). He was an even-tempered, quiet, and gentlemanly. His communicative diction was free from profanity (Macht, 2015, p. 12). As a manager and owner of a baseball team, Connie's long-time experience in the baseball gaming sector portrayed his saintly image and approach to life issues. However, his close friends, including Red Smith, claimed that Connie was warm, wonderful, and tough (Heaphy, 2014, p. 162).

The other characteristics that could define Connie's personality include calculating, demanding, principled, and unpredictable (Macht, 2015, p. 19). Despite his obedience toward the dictatorial commissioner such as Kenesaw Mountain Landis who represented a more significant assortment of MLB owners that strongly objected racial integration in baseball, his leadership in the Philadelphia baseball team manifested a racist-free approach to managing cross-cultural groups of people (Macht, 2015, p. 43).

Contrarily, John McGraw was a man easy to detest. He managed the New York Giants baseball team for a significantly long time. A majority of baseball game fans hated John McGraw due to the way he approached issue resolution in the team and the game at large. As a leader, he was characterized by a rasping voice that was often sarcastic and insulting to umpires, opponents, and even his team players (Okrent, Lewine, & Nemec, 2000). He had a personality like that of 'Little Napoleon' whereby arrogance, abrasiveness, and a pugnacious temperament (Heaphy, 2014, p. 160). His tyrannical approach to team management was inspired by the notion that nine mediocre players could be pulled together by a competent head to work better than nine talented players without a unified oversight.

Replies to Classmates' Posts

Reply to Post 1

The claims toward the personalities of John McGraw and Connie Mack are vague owing to a lack of adequate referencing to pieces of evidence. This is based on the fact that discussions could be biased if only dependent on emotional and opinionated judgments. In research-based communication, there is a need to strongly rely on reassuring evidence to fully support given postulates and ideologies. Evidence could help in differentiating Connie personality-dependent moves from ownership responsibilities.

Also, there is a need for matching the claims about personalities of the team managers to the performances and results of their various teams to portray whether the personalities are generally value-adding or deteriorating to the essence of team management. However, John McGraw's personality is better defined by concentrating on his behavioral approaches to the management of the various issues in the team and amid their interaction with opponents. Notably, it could be well-defined if well supported by tangible evidence from the managerial approaches of the heads.

Reply to Post 2

The post clearly responds to the comparing and contrasting needs for the particular assignment. Key to note, the post highlights the personality-related similarities and differences in the way John McGraw and Connie Mack approached managerial issues at the New York Giants and Phillies teams, respectively. There is a remarkable discussion revolving around the way these two American coaches managed their teams when it comes to pursuing the various baseball team goals and objectives as well as nurturing talents along with their career growth objectives, aims, and desires.

Notably, the discussion thread exhaustively paints out the differences and similarities between the ways these two baseball team managers provided oversight services and manifested their understanding of the gaming doctrines for the baseball game in general. It is inevitably recognizable how the discussion thread satisfactorily proves an answer to the question that calls for informed reference to both the factual and opinion-based data.

References

Heaphy, L. (2014). Baseball before 1920. A Companion to American Sport History, 153-176. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leslie_Heaphy/publication/300687788_Baseball_Before_1920/links/5b33b7220f7e9b0df5ce20d7/Baseball-Before-1920.pdf

Macht, N. L. (2015). The Grand Old Man of Baseball: Connie Mack in His Final Years, 1932-1956. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Gw9mCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&dq=Personalities+of+John+McGraw+and+Connie+Mack+book&ots=aW0_krGjqN&sig=605vEbBjhjGRL6T0uBOSOv4RqR0

Okrent, D., Lewine, H., & Nemec, D. (Eds.). (2000). The Ultimate Baseball Book: The Classic Illustrated History of the World's Greatest Game. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5mHlMNbWXvEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Personalities+of+John+McGraw+and+Connie+Mack+book&ots=72bLK7NDkz&sig=kGv4eaVVLtZJX7AtVwUevJVmSQQ