Equal and Fair Treatment: Cornerstone of the Workplace - Essay Sample

Introduction

I have highlighted three rights from the scenario which include equal and fair treatment, freedom from retaliation, and safe workplace. According to my opinion, fair and equal treatment explain more about the cornerstone of any stated workplace. The importance of the workplace is that it enables people to have an equal safeguard from rare discernment as stated by rule and if disrupted the firm can face some legal charges. It also serves as an actual life example for all people in the workplace both men and women to be treated equally (Jones, 2002). A secure safe workplace is a crucial employee right which seemly transforms the days of industrial rebellion. It is the role and right of the employees to provide a clean, safe, and hospitable working environment. It is the work of the employers to take the responsibility of protecting their own employees if possible, so as to give them a conducive working condition. Lastly, sovereignty from retaliation is a closed top-secret for successively running an effective ethical organization. It is most essential since it sends a signal when to some degree isn't in the right position. Again, the protection of both public and employee while helping them to speak out with no fear of retaliation.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Ethical Responsibilities

Firstly, employers are governed by ethical responsibilities to allow the employee to understand the anticipation of them. This reveals right to the situation since the whole resolution of the expansion period is to show their workers what is demanded from them regardless of the moral behavior. If the owner is not willing to definite the projected, then there is no chance for every employee to get any chance to accomplish what is expected to the standards of the employer (Joyner, 2002). It is wrong for pulling back the member of staff to an incredible average. In addition, the employers are supposed to have an ethical obligation to allow the employee to develop and be capable of performing work with an insightful meaning to the employee. It is not a must for the employee to take benefit of progress if they are not in need but on the other hand, the manager is supposed to entail moral and ethical obligation to permit improvement and progression if promising. The interval of time we are on earth is limited, therefore we should utilize the available period to finish the work because if not achieved, it results to be unethical to stop a servant from spending his time wisely.

Personal Ethical Business Dilemma

An individual ethical business tight spot is used to size the considerate of the employee towards the corporation's ethic of values and which it turns to be a theoretical situation by describing. You are at work in a transactions business where at the end of every month the goal of your total sales to trade twenty credit cards at the end of the month. A case of an aged who usually visits your workplace and are keen seeking assistance in accepting their regular declarations. You get up and guide them to take a bid for his credit card, but unfairly decline. It is obvious for you to push hard for these sales which are not guaranteed to attain your set goal and you will have to force extra pressure in performance in order to attain your goal. A situation where an elderly couple is departing your working store you swiftly remark that it is a must for them receive a card in the mail and if not interested to reduce it short. For them, it seems so confusing but say fine and left the stock store. Still, if they are accidentally requested to take advantage on the credit cards they obvious say no, but since you had that opportunity to settle the agreement by putting the credit card app, thus this drives you to hit your set objective. This condition remains definitely not right since it interrupts the truth created stuck between the customers and their business. It also interrupts the obligation you prepared to your boss by acting in a manner as stated by the company's value.

Evaluation of the Dilemma

The differences between relativistic and utilitarian perspectives are expected to vary differently in this style. Utilitarian is dualistic, white, and dark, to a point where the path of action encourages the best welfares to the community or a crowd is stated as the utmost ethical choice. Relativism is defined as non-binary, several shadows resembling grey, as these actions are most moral and ethical depending on the perspective (Cohen, 2001). Observing at the cause dilemma in section A3 by use of utilitarianism I sense inadequate data to decide a decision of activities that the member was wrong or unethical. Still on key code balance there surely no anybody who aids from the schedules used.

Ethical Decisions

Not steering personal business on the firm time, such as planning of the doctor's appointment on the company telephone line or by requesting a call to someone in the other side of the business while ticking on the clock. A grey era usually occurs in this, where is the link between necessary or inappropriate? Still, the idea of directing your own business affairs may greatly affect the main agendas in the strategies set by the company (Van Loo, 1993). This is really crucial important since it protects the relationship between the employee and the customers. The stated above ethical decisions can be a part of the ethical dilemma and the respective individual need to justify reasons for setting their own affairs into considerations. This may affect the decision made by the company in attaining the set goal, and therefore, it is essential to provide common excuses for such interfering chaos. An employer is not supposed to engage in settling up his/her personal or business affairs while right at other business position. This literally unethical and wrong.

References

Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319-336.

Glenn, J. R., & Van Loo, M. F. (1993). Business students' and practitioners' ethical decisions over time. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(11), 835-847.

Jones, S. (2002). Employee rights, employee responsibilities and knowledge sharing in intelligent organization. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 14(2-3), 69-78.

Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297-311.